Formação de formadores nas universidades: o uso das tecnologias digitais para proporcionar um ensino centrado no aluno

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v64.105673

Palavras-chave:

Aprendizado, desenvolvimento de treinadores, educação física, ensino superior

Resumo

Introdução: Existe uma tendência nos programas de formação de formadores (PFE) para a utilização de abordagens centradas no aluno, especialmente na universidade. Além disso, tem sido estimulado o crescimento do PFE online, em resposta à evolução tecnológica do século XXI. No entanto, são raros os estudos que discutem a utilização das tecnologias digitais de informação e comunicação (TICD) para promover abordagens de formação de treinadores centradas no aluno.
Objectivos: (a) apresentar um quadro para o ensino centrado no aluno (SCT) e directrizes para a utilização das ICTD em linha com esta abordagem; (b) apresentar e discutir propostas para a utilização das TDIC que possam permitir uma abordagem centrada no aluno na EFP, especialmente para o contexto universitário.
Desenvolvimento: Refletimos sobre as implicações da utilização das ICTD para proporcionar uma EFP universitária centrada no aluno, propondo sete princípios práticos: 1) capacitar os professores em termos de conhecimento do ECA e capacidade de utilizar as ICTD; 2) proporcionar um ambiente de apoio e rico em feedback utilizando diferentes ICTD; 3) proporcionar oportunidades de controlo e escolha das TCID por parte dos alunos-treinadores; 4) considerar os conhecimentos prévios dos alunos-formadores sobre o conteúdo do curso e as ICTD; 5) incluir diferentes opções de PTIC no processo de ensino-aprendizagem; 6) utilizar as ICTD para criar ambientes de colaboração e discussão entre o professor e os alunos-tutores; 7) avaliar a eficácia da tecnologia na satisfação das diversas e emergentes necessidades dos estudantes-formadores.
Conclusões: Para que as ICTD sejam parte integrante das mudanças educativas, os professores devem compreender os princípios da ECA que estão incorporados nas aplicações tecnológicas. Ao utilizar o ICTD, os professores podem fornecer conteúdos de uma forma mais flexível, criando ambientes online centrados no aluno.

Referências

Abraham, A., Morgan, G., North, J., Muir, B., Duffy, P., Allison, W., Cale, A., & Hodgson, R. (2013, may 21-24th). Task analysis of coach developers: applications to the FA youth coach educator role [conference session]. International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307980388_Task_Analysis_of_Coach_Developers_Applications_to_The_FA_Youth_Coach_Educator_Role.

Almeida, M. E. B. (2003). Educação a distância na internet: abordagens e contribuições dos ambientes digitais de aprendizagem. Educação e Pesquisa, 29(2), 327–340. https://www.scielo.br/j/ep/a/dSsTzcBQV95VGCf6GJbtpLy/abstract/?lang=pt

APA. (1997). Learner-Centered Psychological Principles: a framework for school reform and redesign. American Psychological Association.

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning — a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672

Blumberg, P. (2009). Developing Learner-Centered Teaching. Jossey-Bass.

Carl, A., & Strydom, S. (2017). e-Portfolio as reflection tool during teaching practice: The interplay between contextual and dispositional variables. South African Journal of Education, 37, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n1a1250

Ciampolini, V., Milistetd, M., Brasil, V. Z., & Nascimento, J. V. do. (2019). Teaching strategies adopted in coach education programs: analysis of publications from 2009 to 2015. Journal of Physical Education, 30(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v30i1.3006

Cifuentes, A. A. S., Ángeles, M. A. V., & Parrací, C. A. R. (2022). Formación académica permanente y experiencia de los entrenadores de rendimiento y alto rendimiento en Colombia. Retos, 46, 368–377. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.93256

Cullen, R., Harris, M., & Hill, R. (2012). The Learner-Centered Curriculum: Design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Culver, D. M., Werthner, P., & Trudel, P. (2019). Coach developers as ‘facilitators of learning’ in a large-scale coach education programme: one actor in a complex system. International Sport Coaching Journal, 6(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2018-0081

Cushion, C. J., & Townsend, R. C. (2018). Technology-enhanced learning in coaching: a review of literature. Educational Review, 71(5), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1457010

Dohme, L., Rankin-Wright, A. J., & Lara-Bercial, S. (2019). Beyond knowledge transfer: the role of coach developers as motivators for lifelong learning. International Sport Coaching Journal, 6(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2019-0034

Dray, K., & Howells, K. (2019). Exploring the use of e-portfolios in higher education coaching programs. International Sport Coaching Journal, 6(3), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2018-0082

Driska, A. P., & Gould, D. R. (2014). Evaluating a problem-based group learning strategy for online, graduate-level coach education. Kinesiology Review, 3(4), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2014-0061

English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1339

Galatti, L., dos Santos, Y. Y. S., & Korsakas, P. (2019). A Coach developers’ narrative on scaffolding a learner-centred coaching course in Brazil. International Sport Coaching Journal, 6(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2018-0084

Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., & Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369349

ICCE. (2016). ICCE Standards for Higher Education Bachelor Coaching Degree Programmes. https://www.icce.ws/_assets/files/icds-draft-4-final-november-23.pdf

ICCE, ASOIF, & LMU. (2014). International Coach Developer Framework v1.1. International Council for Coaching Excellence.

Jarvis, P. (2009). The Routledge International Handbook of Lifelong Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638461

Jones, R., Fonseca, J., De Martin Silva, L., Davies, G., Morgan, K., & Mesquita, I. (2014). The promise and problems of video diaries: building on current research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 7(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2014.938687

Jones, R. L. (2006). The Sports Coach as Educator. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203020074

Jones, R. L., & Turner, P. (2006). Teaching coaches to coach holistically: can problem-based learning (pbl) help? Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 11(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980600708429

Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x

Kennedy, G., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1233

Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500352816

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733

López, M. G., Jaenes, S. J. C., Vázquez C. E., & López M. E. (2019). Formación permanente y necesidades de formación de los entrenadores de rugby en Andalucía. Retos, 36, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v36i36.66815

Mallett, C. J., Rynne, S. B., & Dickens, S. (2013). Developing high performance coaching craft through work and study. In P. Potrac, W. Gilbert, & J. Denison (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sports Coaching (Vol.1, pp. 463–475). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203132623

Mccarthy, L., & Stoszkowski, J. (2018). A heutagogical approach to coach education : what worked for one particular learner, how and why ? Journal of Qualitative Research in Sports Studies, 12(1), 317–336.

Mccombs, B. L. (2015). Learner-centered online instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(144), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20163

McCombs, B. L. (1997). Self-assessment and reflection: ools for promoting teacher changes toward learner-centered practices. NASSPT Bulletin, 81(587), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659708158702

McCombs, & Vakili, D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1582–1600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00534.x

McQuade, S., & Nash, C. (2015). The role of the coach developer in supporting and guiding coach learning. International Sport Coaching Journal, 2(3), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2015-0059

Mead, S., Spencer, K., & Kidman, L. (2016). Video self-reflection and coach development in New Zealand. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 7(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2016.1196113

Meyer, K. A (2014). Student engagement in online learning: what works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20018

Milistetd, M., Salles, W. das N., Backes, A. F., Mesquita, I., & Nascimento, J. V. do. (2019a). Learner-centered teaching in a university-based coach education: first attempts through action research inquiry. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 14(3), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954119842957

Milistetd, M., Salles, W. das N., Trudel, P., & Paquette, K. (2019b). Making Direct Teaching more Learner-Centered in University-Based Coach Education Courses. In B. Callary & B. Gearity (Eds.), Coach Education and Development in Sport (1st ed., pp. 7–19). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351037-2

Milistetd, M., Trudel, P., Rynne, S., Mesquita, I. M. R., & do Nascimento, J. V. (2018). The learner-centred status of a Brazilian university coach education program. International Sport Coaching Journal, 5(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2017-0075

Moreira, D., & Barros, D. (2020). Orientações práticas para a comunicação síncrona e assíncrona em contextos educativos digitais. Repositório aberto da Universidade de Alberta, 10. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/9661

Morgan, K., Jones, R. L., Gilbourne, D., & Llewellyn, D. (2013). Changing the face of coach education: using ethno-drama to depict lived realities. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 18(5), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.690863

Nelson, L., Cushion, C., & Potrac, P. (2013). Enhancing the provision of coach education: the recommendations of UK coaching practitioners. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 18(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.649725

Paquette, K., Hussain, A., Trudel, P., & Camiré, M. (2014). A Sport federation’s attempt to restructure a coach education program using constructivist principles. International Sport Coaching Journal, 1(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2013-0006

Paquette, K., & Trudel, P. (2018a). The evolution and learner-centered status of a coach education program. International Sport Coaching Journal, 5(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2017-0038

Paquette, K., & Trudel, P. (2018b). Learner-centered coach education: practical recommendations for coach development administrators. International Sport Coaching Journal, 5(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2017-0084

Perea Rodríguez, R. L., & Abello Avila, C. M. (2022). Competencias digitales en estudiantes y docentes universitarios del área de la educación física y el deporte. Retos, 43, 1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v43i0.86401

Roberts, S. J., & Ryrie, A. (2014). Socratic case-method teaching in sports coach education: reflections of students and course tutors. Sport, Education and Society, 19(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.632626

Santos, Y. Y. S., Palma, B. P, McCarthy, L., Casline, L. S., Cardoso, C., & Rafaela Galatti , L. (2023a). University-based coach education: the e-portfolio as a formative assessment tool of student-coaches’ learning. International Sport Coaching Journal, 11(3), 414-424. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.127202

Santos, Y. Y. S., Culver, D., & Rafaela Galatti, L. (2023b). Formação de treinadores(as) no contexto universitário: a complexidade da apropriação e do desenvolvimento do ensino centrado no(a) aprendiz. Movimento, 29, e29042. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.127202

Salles, W. das N. (2019). Desenvolvimento do ensino centrado no aprendiz: estratégias, percepções e implicações à formação inicial universitária em Educação Física [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina]. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/206422

Seifu, K. (2020). Determinants of information and communication technology integration in teaching-learning process at Aksum University. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1824577. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1824577

Setiawan, I. (2024). Implementación de programas de desarrollo profesional docente en línea: perspectivas de los docentes de educación física. Retos, 57, 445–454. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v57.105406

Stoszkowski, J., & Collins, D. (2017). Nirvana or never-never land: does heutagogy have a place in coach development? International Sport Coaching Journal, 4(3), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2017-0001

Stoszkowski, J., & McCarthy, L. (2018). “Who wouldn’t want to take charge of their learning?” Student views on learner autonomy, self-determination and motivation. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 104–107. https://jpaap.napier.ac.uk/index.php/JPAAP/article/view/330

Stoszkowski, J., McCarthy, L., & Fonseca, J. (2017). Online peer mentoring and collaborative reflection: a cross-institutional project in sports coaching. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5(3), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.289

Trudel, P., Culver, D., & Richard, J.-P. (2016). Peter Jarvis: Lifelong Coach Learning. In L. Nelson, R. Groom, & P. Potrac (Eds.), Learning in Sport Coaching: Theory and Application (1st ed., pp. 202–214). Routledge.

Trudel, P., Culver, D., & Werthner, P. (2013). Looking at Coach Development from the Coach-Learner’s Perspective. In P. Potrac, W. Gilbert, & J. Denison (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sports Coaching (1 st ed., pp. 375–387). Routledge.

Trudel, P., Milistetd, M., & Culver, D. M. (2020). What the empirical studies on sport coach education programs in higher education have to reveal: a review. International Sport Coaching Journal, 7(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2019-0037

Turner, D., & Nelson, L. (2009). Graduate perceptions of a UK university-based coach education programme, and impacts on development and employability. International Journal of Coaching Science, 3(2), 3–28.

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Keys Changes to Practice. Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-03-01

Como Citar

Sato dos Santos, Y. Y., de Andrade Rodrigues, H., Woodburn, A., M. Culver, D., & Rafaela Galatti, L. (2025). Formação de formadores nas universidades: o uso das tecnologias digitais para proporcionar um ensino centrado no aluno. Retos, 64, 403–415. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v64.105673

Edição

Vol. 64 (2025)

Secção

Revisões teóricas sistemáticas e/ou metanálises

Licença

Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Yura Yuka Sato dos Santos, Heitor de Andrade Rodrigues, Andrea Woodburn, Diane M. Culver, Larissa Rafaela Galatti

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e assegurar a revista o direito de ser a primeira publicação da obra como licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite que outros para compartilhar o trabalho com o crédito de autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  2. Os autores podem estabelecer acordos adicionais separados para a distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicado na revista (por exemplo, a um repositório institucional, ou publicá-lo em um livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  3. É permitido e os autores são incentivados a divulgar o seu trabalho por via electrónica (por exemplo, em repositórios institucionais ou no seu próprio site), antes e durante o processo de envio, pois pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como a uma intimação mais Cedo e mais do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) (em Inglês).

Esta revista é a "política de acesso aberto" de Boai (1), apoiando os direitos dos usuários de "ler, baixar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, pesquisar, ou link para os textos completos dos artigos". (1) http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess