Diferencias de rendimiento táctico-técnico entre equipos ganadores y perdedores en un tie-break de vóley playa femenino

Autores/as

  • Vanessa da Silva Lima Department of Physical Education, State University of Ceara, Ceara, Brazil; Department of Physical Education, Associate Graduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Paraiba, Paraiba, Brazil;
  • Antonio García-de-Alcaraz Faculty of Education Sciences, SPORT Research Group (CTS-1024), CERNEP Research Center, University of Almería, Almeria, Spain;.
  • José Manuel Palao Department of Health, Exercise Science and Sport Management, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, United States
  • Alexandre Igor Araripe Medeiros Federal University of Ceara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-353X
  • Gilmario Ricarte Batista Department of Physical Education, Associate Graduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Paraiba, Paraiba, Brazil;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v73.110330

Palabras clave:

Deportes de arena, análisis del juego, indicadores de rendimiento, variables situacionales, fase de juego

Resumen

Introducción y Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los indicadores de rendimiento técnico-táctico entre equipos ganadores y perdedores en el tie-break según su diferencia de puntos final.

Metodología. Se observaron y analizaron las acciones de juego (n=4,872) realizadas en 31 sets disputados en partidos equilibrados durante los Campeonatos del Mundo de 2019 y 2022 (100%). El análisis de conglomerados definió tres tipos de sets en función de la diferencia de puntos final (2, 3-4 y 5 o más puntos). Los indicadores de rendimiento analizados fueron el número total de puntos anotados en cada complejo de juego, el número de puntos y errores del oponente, y el coeficiente de rendimiento del saque, recepción, colocación, ataque, bloqueo y defensa en cada complejo. Se llevó a cabo una prueba T con un tamaño del efecto para comparar los tres tipos de sets establecidos.

Resultados. Los ganadores anotaron más puntos en KII (ataque y bloqueo), y mostraron una mayor eficacia de ataque (salida de recepción) y menor error de ataque (KIII) y bloqueo en comparación con los perdedores. Los ganadores y perdedores mostraron diferencias en el rendimiento según el tipo de tie-break: a) en ataque en salida de recepción en sets cerrados (diferencia de 2 puntos), b) en el rendimiento del saque para sets de “3-4 puntos”, y c) en contraataque en sets de 5 o más puntos.

Conclusiones. A menor diferencia de puntos a final de set, menos indicadores de rendimiento diferencian ganadores de perdedores.

Referencias

Alcock, A., & Cable, N. T. (2017). A comparison of singles and doubles badminton: heart rate response, player profiles and game characteristics. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9(2), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868479

Alder, D. B., Broadbent, D. P., Stead, J., & Poolton, J. (2019). The impact of physiological load on anticipation skills in badminton: From testing to training. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(16), 1816–1823. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1596051

Anguera, M. (2003). Observational methods (general). In R. Fernández-Ballestero (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 632–637).

Carlstedt, R. (2004). Critical moments during competition: A mind-body model of sport performance when it counts the most. P. Press.

Coleman, J. E., Neville, B., & Gordon, B. (1969). A statistical system for volleyball and its use in Chicago Women's Assn. International Volleyball Review, 17, 72–73.

Drikos, S., Sotiropoulos, K., Barzouka, K., & Angelonidis, Y. (2020). The contribution of skills in the interpretation of a volleyball set result with minimum score difference across genders. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 15(4), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954120930307

Drikos, S., Fatahi, A., Al-Din Ahmed, S., Molavian, R., Giatsis, G., & Shakeri, A. (2025). A comparative analysis of volleyball skills in balanced sets for men and women in Asian competitions. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 20(1), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.55860/j7d91004

Fédération Internationale de Volleyball. (2023). FIVB official volleyball rules 2021-2024. Retrieved 10/07/2023 from https://www.fivb.com/en/beachvolleyball/thegame_bvb_glossary/officialrulesofthegames

Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(3), 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309

García-de-Alcaraz, A., & Marcelino, R. (2017). Influence of match quality on men’s volleyball performance at different competition levels. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 17(4), 394-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1348058

Giatsis, G. (2023). Beach volleyball performance benchmarks in men’s high level. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 18(2), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2023.182.15

Giatsis, G., Lola, A., Drikos, S., Lopez-Martinez, A. B., & Turpin, J. A. P. (2023). Beach volleyball set and technical performance indicators for elite women’s teams. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2023.183.10

Giatsis, G., Lopez-Martinez, A., & García, G. (2015). The efficacy of the attack and block in game phases on male FIVB and CEV beach volleyball. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 10(2), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2015.102.01

Giatsis, G., & Panagiotis, Z. (2008). Statistical analysis of men's FIVB Beach Volleyball team performance. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 8(1), 31-43. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/uwic/ujpa/2008/00000008/00000001/art00005

Kumar, G., Shukla, A., Chhoker, A., & Thapa, R. K. (2021). Identification of factors determining winning in men’s and women’s beach volleyball: A logistical regression approach. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 21(1), 26–35.

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Lima, V. da S. ., Rocha, F. B. F., Diniz, I. B., García-de-Alcaraz, A., Palao, J. M. ., Costa, G. de C. T., Mesquita, I., Araripe Medeiros, A. I., & Batista, G. R. . (2023). Situación de los estudios de investigación en voleibol y de vóley playa: Un análisis bibliométrico ( Status of Match Analysis Research in In-door and Beach Volleyball: A bibliometric analysis). Retos, 50, 838-848. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v50.100039

McHugh, M. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.

Medeiros, A., Marcelino, R., Mesquita, I., & Palao, J. M. (2017). Performance differences between winning and losing under-19, under-21 and senior teams in men’s beach volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 17(1–2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1304029

Meffert, D., O'Shannessy, C., Born, P., Grambow, R., & Vogt, T. (2018). Tennis serve performances at break points: Approaching practice patterns for coaching. European Journal of Sport Science, 18(8), 1151–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1490821

Michalopoulou, M., Papadimitriou, K., Lignos, N., Taxildaris, K., & Antoniou, P. (2005). Computer analysis of the technical and tactical effectiveness in Greek Beach Volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(1), 41–50. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/uwic/ujpa/2005/00000005/00000001/art00006

Palao, J. M., & Ortega, E. (2015). Skill efficacy in men’s beach volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 15(1), 125–134.

Palao, J. M., López, P., & Ortega, E. (2015). Design and validation of an observational instrument for technical and tactical actions in beach volleyball. Motriz, 21(2), 137-147.

Rodriguez-Ruiz, D., Quiroga, M. E., Miralles, J. A., Sarmiento, S., De Saá, Y., & García-Manso, J. M. (2011). Study of the technical and tactical variables determining set win or loss in top-level European men's volleyball. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 7(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1281

Ronglan, L. T., & Grydeland, J. (2006). The effects of changing the rules and reducing the court dimension on the relative strengths between game actions in top international beach volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 6(1), 1-12. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/uwic/ujpa/2006/00000006/00000001/art00003

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper & Row.

Taylor, J., Mellalieu, S., James, N., & Shearer, D. (2008). The influence of match location, quality of opposition, and match status on technical performance in professional association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(9), 885-895.

Zhang, S., Lorenzo, A., Zhou, C., Cui, Y., Gonçalves, B., & Angel Gómez, M. (2018). Performance profiles and opposition interaction during game-play in elite basketball: Evidences from National Basketball Association. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 19(1), 28-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2018.1555738

Descargas

Publicado

28-11-2025

Número

Sección

Artículos de carácter científico: investigaciones básicas y/o aplicadas

Cómo citar

Lima, V. da S., García-de-Alcaraz, A., Palao, J. M., Araripe Medeiros, A. I., & Batista, G. R. (2025). Diferencias de rendimiento táctico-técnico entre equipos ganadores y perdedores en un tie-break de vóley playa femenino. Retos, 73, 1607-1617. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v73.110330