Implementación del modelo CIPP para evaluar el avance del rendimiento en los deportes de petanca de Java Oriental (Implementing the CIPP model for evaluating the advancement of performance in the East Java petanque sports)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.105989Palabras clave:
CIPP, Evaluation, Petanque, East JavaResumen
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo examinar el proceso de implementación del programa de desarrollo de logros deportivos en petanca de Java Oriental, centrándose en sus factores contextuales, requisitos de entrada, aspectos de procedimiento y resultados resultantes. La investigación antes mencionada se enmarca dentro del ámbito de la investigación de evaluación del modelo CIPP, empleando una metodología cuantitativa. Se empleó una estrategia de muestreo intencional para seleccionar a los sujetos para este estudio, que consta de 5 entrenadores y 35 atletas masculinos y femeninos de 5 FOPI de Pengkab y Pengkot en Java Oriental. La investigación incluyó un cuestionario que incluía el CIPP, cuyo objetivo era recopilar información sobre los antecedentes del entrenador, el programa de entrenamiento para el deporte de petanca, el desempeño del entrenador y el método de entrenamiento utilizado por los atletas en el género deportivo de petanca. Los datos cuantitativos se recogieron mediante el uso de una escala Likert. El análisis de datos incluyó técnicas analíticas descriptivas, concretamente la utilización de porcentajes. Los hallazgos del estudio indican que el análisis de evaluación del CIPP reveló que el 73,75% de las dimensiones del apoyo contextual para la implementación del programa cayeron en la categoría de "apoyo". Además, el 69% del componente de insumos de recursos humanos fue clasificado como "adecuado". El insumo del programa se clasifica como “hecho” con un ratio del 63,57%. El insumo para la selección de deportistas y la infraestructura se clasifica como “siempre hecho” con un ratio del 82,11%. Las dimensiones de formación de procesos también se clasifican como “siempre hechas” con un ratio del 78,57%. Por último, las dimensiones del producto formativo se califican como “muy esperado”, con un ratio del 75,63%. En resumen, el gobierno ha brindado un apoyo sustancial a la dimensión del contexto. La dimensión de entrada comprende recursos de instructores y atletas de calidad suficiente, así como instalaciones e infraestructura de entrenamiento que sean muy adecuadas. Los numerosos componentes del proceso general de formación se ejecutan de forma consistente y competente. Los componentes del producto demuestran conformidad con las expectativas, aunque necesitan mejoras.
Palabras clave: CIPP; evaluación; petanca; Java Oriental
Abstract. This study aimed to examine the implementation process of the East Java petanque sports achievement development programme, focusing on its contextual factors, input requirements, procedural aspects, and resulting outcomes. The aforementioned research falls within the purview of CIPP model evaluation research, employing a quantitative methodology. A purposive sampling strategy was employed to select the subjects for this study, consisting of 5 coaches and 35 male and female athletes from 5 FOPI district and city in East Java. The research included a questionnaire that included the CIPP, which aimed to gather information regarding the coach's background, the coaching programme for petanque sport, the coach's performance, and the training method utilised by athletes in the petanque sport genre. Quantitative data was gathered by using a Likert scale. The data analysis included descriptive analytic techniques, namely utilising percentages. The study's findings indicate that the CIPP evaluation analysis revealed that 73.75% of the dimensions of context support for programme implementation fell into the "support" category. Additionally, 69% of the human resources input component was classified as "adequate." The program's input is classified as "done" with a ratio of 63.57%. The input for athlete selection and infrastructure is classified as "always done" with a ratio of 82.11%. The process training dimensions are also classified as "always done" with a ratio of 78.57%. Lastly, the dimensions of the training product are classified as "very as expected," with a ratio of 75.63%. In summary, the government has provided substantial support for the context dimension. The input dimension comprises instructors and athletes' resources of sufficient quality, as well as training facilities and infrastructure that are highly adequate. The many components of the overall training process are consistently executed proficiently. The product components demonstrate conformity to expectations, although they necessitate enhancement.
Keywords: CIPP; evaluation; petanque; East Java
Referencias
Aldapit, E., & Suharjana, S. (2019). CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.33292/PETIER.V1I2.10
Alim, A. (2012). Pengaruh Olahraga Terprogram Terhadap Tekanan Darah dan Daya Tahan Kardiorespirasi Pada Atlet Pelatda Sleman Cabang Tenis Lapangan. Medikora, VIII(2).
Alvarez, K., Salas, E., & Garofano, C. M. (2004). An Integrated Model of Training Evaluation and Effectiveness. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 385–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304270820
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian : suatu pendekatan praktek. Rineka Cipta.
Benczenleitner, O., Bognár, J., Révész, L., Paksi, J., Csáki, I., & Géczi, G. (2013). Motivation and motivational climate among elite hammer throwers. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 5(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2013-0002
Boardley, I. D., Kavussanu, M., & Ring, C. (2008). Athletes ’ Perceptions of Coaching Effectiveness and Athlete-Related Outcomes in Rugby Union : An Investigation Based on the Coaching Efficacy Model. The Sport Psychologist, 269–287.
Brown, C., Willett, J., Goldfine, R., & Goldfine, B. (2018). Sport management internships: Recommendations for improving upon experiential learning. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 22(February), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.02.001
Chelladurai, P. (2007). Leadership in Sports. In Handbook of Sport Psychology, Third Edition.
Dermawna, A. (2022). Strategi Peningkatan Prestasi Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Pada Pekan Olahraga Nasional Ke-20 Di Papua. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 6(3), 10323–10329. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i3.3423
Duda, J. L. (2004). Goal Setting and Achievement Motivation in Sport. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, Three-Volume Set, December 2004, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-657410-3/00804-7
Elia, J., Khaddage-Soboh, N., Chahine, L., Hamieh, M., & Kassem, Y. (2020). Motivations and barriers that impact Lebanese Athletes’ achievements at the Olympics. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(2), 333–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2019-1777
Fox, A. (2006). The Importance of Coaching Control. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 1(1), 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1260/174795406776338472
Gábor, G., Géza, V., Miklós, K., & József, B. (2010). Elite Young Team Players’ Coping, Motivation and Perceived Climate Measures. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 46(1), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10141-009-0020-2
Gilbert, W. D., & Trudel, P. (2001). Learning to coach through experience: Reflection in model youth sport coaches. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.21.1.16
Hallmann, K., Wicker, P., Breuer, C., & Schönherr, L. (2012). Understanding the importance of sport infrastructure for participation in different sports - findings from multi-level modeling. European Sport Management Quarterly, 12(5), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2012.687756
Hanief, Y. N., & Purnomo, A. M. I. (2019). Petanque: Apa saja faktor fisik penentu prestasinya? Jurnal Keolahragaan, 7(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v7i2.26619
Hidayah, T., Pratama, R. S., Nasuka, Rahayu, S., Budiono, I., Sugiharto, Nadzalan, A. M., Hafidz, A., Purwoto, S. P., & Nurrachmad, L. (2024). Do Petanque Sports Athletes in Jawa Tengah Need Android-Based Applications for Training Program Implementation? Retos, 53, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.47197/RETOS.V53.102289
Hidayat, T., Setijono, H., Kusnanik, N. W., Nurhasan, Ardha, M. A. Al, & Yang, C. B. (2022). The Implementation of CIPP Model Evaluation at East Java Women Volleyball Team during the Preparation for Indonesia Olympic Games (PON) XX. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 10(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2022.100210
Kaya, A. (2014). Decision Making by Coaches and Athletes in Sport. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.205
Khalid, M. M., Rehman, C. A., & Ashraf, M. (2012). Exploring the link between Kirkpatrick (KP) and context, input, process and product (CIPP) training evaluation models, and its effect on training evaluation in public organizations of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 6(1), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm11.2087
Kuo et al. (2012). An Evaluation Model of Integrating Emerging Technology into Formal Curriculum. International Journal Of Education And Information Technologies, 6(3), 250–259.
Laksana, G. B., Pramono, H., & Mukarromah, S. B. (2017). Perspektif Olahraga Petanque dalam Mendukung Prestasi Olahraga Jawa Tengah. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 6(1), 8.
Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP. Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan”. At, 6(1), 23.
Mallett, C. (2006). Beyond Winning and Losing : Guidelines for Evaluating High Beyond Winning and Losing : High Performance Coaches. The Sport Psychologist, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.20.2.213
Mata, R. U. I. T., Rui, A., & Silva, D. A. (2013). Winning or Not Winning : The influence on Coach- Athlete Relationships and Goal Achievement. Journal Of Human Sport & Exercise, 8(4), 986–995. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.84.09
Moraru, C. E., Radu, L. E., & Grosu, E. F. (2015). Aspects on the Type of Motivation in Sports. 5Th International Conference Lumen 2014, Transdisciplinary and Communicative Action (Lumen-Tca 2014), February, 507–511.
Nurhasan, Al Ardha, M. A., Ristanto, K. O., Yang, C. B., Wijayanto, A., Pradana, S. W. K. C., Putra, N. S. R. P., Firmansyah, A., Bikalawan, S. S., Rizki, A. Z., & Utomo, R. S. (2024). Kinematic Movement Differences Between Petanque Pointing and Shooting Technique in Children. Retos, 52, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.47197/RETOS.V52.97143
Okilanda, A., Arisman, A., Lestari, H., Lanos, M. E. C., Fajar, M., Putri, S. A. R., & Sugarwanto, S. (2018). Sosialisasi Petanque Sebagai Olahraga Masa Kini. Jurnal Bagimu Negeri, 2(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.26638/jbn.638.8651
Palmizal, A. (2017). The Evaluation Of Provincial Sport Training Center (PELATDA) Towards National Sport Competion (PON) XIX/2016 West Java. JIPES (Journal of Indonesian Physical Education and Sport), 3(1), 48–58.
Pradina, G., Prastuti, I., Rustiadi, T., & Priyono, B. (2020). Evaluation of Performance Program in Tirta Wahana Swimming Club , Grobogan Regency. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 9(2), 175–179.
Qohhar, W., Suherman, A., Mamun, A., Mulyana, Rusdianto, R. M., Rama Yudha, B. A., Pazriansyah, D., Budi, D. R., Himawan Kusuma, M. N., & Anggraeni, D. (2021). Government Policy in the Development of Achievement Sports Coaching in Indonesia. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Public Health, 24(03). https://doi.org/10.36295/ASRO.2021.24373
Ribeiro, J., Davids, K., Silva, P., Coutinho, P., Barreira, D., & Garganta, J. (2021). Talent Development in Sport Requires Athlete Enrichment: Contemporary Insights from a Nonlinear Pedagogy and the Athletic Skills Model. Sports Medicine, 51(6), 1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01437-6
Richard, V., Abdulla, A. M., & Runco, M. (2017). Influence of Skill Level, Experience, Hours of Training, and Other Sport Participation on the Creativity of Elite Athletes. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 2(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.18536/jge.2017.04.02.01.07
Rizqanada, A., Prasetyo, Y., Hutami, D. T., & Darma, G. P. (2022). Evaluation of the coaching program for petanque sports in Kediri District. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 9(3), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.22271/kheljournal.2022.v9.i3b.2520
Sri Wijiastuti, Zandra Dwanita Widodo, Fatkhul Imron, & Kodrad Budiyono. (2023). Sports Human Resources Development (Human Resources Management Survey in Petanque Sport Branch, Surakarta City). International Journal of Asian Business and Management, 2(4), 653–658. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijabm.v2i4.5773
Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2002). Evaluation Models. Evaluation Models. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6
Turkmen, M. (2013). The Relationship Between Motivation Orientations and Competitive Anxiety in Bocce Players: Does Gender Make a Difference. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(4), 162. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130204.12
Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(July), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086
Warju, W. (2016). Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502
Wijayanti, N. I., Yulianti, R., & Wijaya, B. (2019). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pemakai Dengan Model CIPP di Perpustakaan Fakultas Teknik UGM. Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 3(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v3i1.790
Xiong, H. (2007). The evolution of urban society and social changes in sports participation at the grassroots in China. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 42(4), 441–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690208089836
Zhang, G., & Griffith, R. R. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Retos
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).
Esta revista sigue la "open access policy" de BOAI (1), apoyando los derechos de los usuarios a "leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o enlazar los textos completos de los artículos".
(1) http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
