Social stereotypes about ageing among university students of Sports Science. A pilot study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v70.114424Keywords:
Discrimination, education, integration, older adults, sportAbstract
Introduction: Ageing is a natural process in every living being. This process can be seen from different perspectives, and these perceptions can influence how older adults are treated in society. Research conducted among university students on their perception and stereotypes of old age is scarce and very recent.
Objective: To know the attitudes and stereotypes that sport science students have towards old age and to see how the aging profile can condition these stereotypes were the objectives of this research.
Methodology: a quasi-experimental study was carried out on a total of 55 students of third and fourth year of the degree in physical activity and sport sciences, to whom the questionnaire of evaluation of negative stereotypes towards old age was administered before and after two field trips (socio-health centre vs. sports centre).
Results: The results show that students present ageist attitudes, although there is a difference depending on the course (p>0.05) and sex (p>0.05) analysed. Their ageist attitudes, opinions and perceptions have changed according to the profile and health status of the older adults (Health, p=0.003 vs 0.064; Social motivation, p=0.144 vs 0.004; Personality/Character, p=0.688 vs p=0.004) with whom they interacted during their internship.
Discussion: Prejudice and age discrimination are inherent to different cultures, societies and times. Studies have reported that sociodemographic characteristics influence an individual's attitude toward older adults.
Conclusions: Sports science students display ageist attitudes, although there are differences depending on the course and gender analysed. The profile and health status of older adults influence ageism.
References
Abrams, D., Russell, PS., Vauclair, CM. & Swift, H. (2011) Ageism in Europe: Findings from the Euro-pean Social Survey. London, Age UK.
Alves, N., Matos de Souza, M., dos Santos Neto, AP., Viggiano Laurenti, A., Gonçalves de Oliveira, SF. & Silva Fhon, JR. (2024) Actitudes sobre edadismo en estudiantes de enfermería de una universi-dad pública de Brasil. Gerokomos, 35(3), 153-158. https://doi.org/S1134-928X2024000300004.
Ayalon, L. & Tesch-Römer, C. (2018) Contemporary perspectives on ageism. Springer Nature.
Blanca Mena, MJ., Sánchez Palacios, C. & Trianes, M. (2005). Cuestionario de evaluación de estereoti-pos negativos hacia la vejez. Rev multidiscip gerontol, 15(4), 212-220. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1390413
Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2005) Promoción del envejecimiento activo: Efectos del programa “Vivir con vitalidad”. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol, 40(2), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0211-139X(05)74834-4
Fraboni, M., Saltstone, R. & Hughes, S. (1990) The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA): an attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Can J Aging, 9(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980800016093
Gekoski, WL. & Knox, VJ. (1990) Ageism or healthism? Perceptions based on age and health status. J Aging Health, 2(1):15–27. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F089826439000200102
Gherman, MA., Arhiri, L. & Holman, AC, (2022) Ageism, moral sensitivity and nursing students' inten-tions to work with older people–A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 113, 105372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105372
Ilișanu, G. & Andrei, V. (2018) Age stereotypes and ageism at the workplace-# ageisjustanum-ber. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology & Sociology, 9(2), 23-33. http://compaso.eu/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Compaso2018-92-Ilisanu-and-Andrei.pdf
James, JW. & Haley, WE. (1995) Age and health bias in practicing clinical psychologists. Psychol Aging, 10(4), 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.10.4.610
Kalaycı, I., Özbek-Yazıcı, S., Özkul, M. & Helvacı, G. (2018) Attitudes of medical staff and students to-wards the elderly: systematic review. J Adnan Menderes Univ Health Sci Faculty, 2 (1), 21-30. https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=2708030
Kite, ME., Stockdale, GD,, Whitley, BE, & Johnson,, BT. (2005) Attitudes toward younger and older adults: an updated meta-analytic review. J Soc Issues, 61(2), 241–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00404.x
Kroon, AC., Van Selm, M., ter Hoeven, CL. & Vliegenthart, R. (2018) Reliable and unproductive? Stereo-types of older employees in corporate and news media. Ageing & Society, 38(1), 166-191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16000982
Marques, S., Mariano, J., Mendonca, J., De Tavernier, W., Hess, M. & Naegele, L. (2020) Determinants of ageism against older adults: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(7), 2560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072560
Martínez Heredia, N., Santaella Rodríguez, E., & Rodríguez-García, A.-M. (2021). Beneficios de la acti-vidad física para la promoción de un envejecimiento activo en personas mayores. Revisión bi-bliográfica (Benefits of physical activity for the promotion of active aging in elderly. Biblio-graphic review). Retos, 39, 829–834. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i39.74537
Nelson, TD. (2005) Edadismo: prejuicio contra nuestro yo futuro temido. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00402.x
Officer, A., Schneiders, ML., Wu, D., Nash, P., Thiyagarajan, JA. & Beard, JR. (2016) Valuing older peo-ple: time for a global campaign to combat ageism. Bull World Health Organ, 1, 94(10), 710-710A. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.184960
Olshansky, SJ., Willcox, BJ., Demetrius, L. & Beltrán-Sánchez, H. (2024). Implausibility of radical life extension in humans in the twenty-first century. Nature Aging, 4(11), 1635-1642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-024-00702-3
Posthuma, RA. & Campion, MA. (2009) Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, mode-rators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617
Rababa, M., Al-Dwaikat, T. & Almomani, MH. (2021) Assessing knowledge and ageist attitudes and behaviors toward older adults among undergraduate nursing students. Gerontol Geriatr Educ, 42, 347-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2020.1827398
Ramalho, A., Petrica, J., Serrano, J., Paulo, R., Duarte-Mendes, P., & Rosado, A. (2021). Consecuencias del comportamiento sedentario en el bienestar psicosocial: un estudio cualitativo con personas mayores que viven en Portugal (Consequences of sedentary behavior on psychosocial well-being: a qualitative study with older adults living in Port. Retos, 42, 198–210. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.86299
Rupp, DE., Vodanovich, SJ. & Crede, M. (2006) Age bias in the workplace: the impact of ageism and causal attributions. J Appl Soc Psychol, 36(6), 1337–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00062.x
Toygar, I. & Kardakovan, A. (2020) Factors affecting the attitudes of nursing toward ageism. Nurs Pract Today, 7, 38-44. https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v7i1.2298
Van Dijk, T. (2003). La multidisciplinariedad del análisis crítico del discurso: un alegato a favor de la diversidad. Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. 143-177. Barcelona, Gedisa.
World Health Organization [WHO] (2015). World Report on Ageing and Health. Ginebra: WHO. In: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186466/1/9789240694873_spa.pdf
World Health Organization [WHO] (2021). World Report on Ageing. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/ageing-ageism
World Health Organization [WHO](2002). Envejecimiento activo: un marco político. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol, 37 (S2), 74-105. http://envejecimiento.csic.es/documentos/documentos/oms-envejecimiento-01.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jose Mª Cancela Carral, Angel Casal-Moldes, Elena Vila-Suarez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
