Exclusive practice of crawl versus practicing the four swimming strokes on the improvement of crawl technique

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v1i40.76840

Keywords:

Swimming, technique, principle of variety, principle of specialization

Abstract

Context: Many aspects related to the teaching-learning process in swimming have not been subject of study. Objective: The purpose of the present investigation was to verify which methodological approach is more effective in improving the crawl technique: Exclusive practice of crawl, or practicing the four swimming strokes. Method: 26 male university students were randomly allocated into two groups: Crawl Group (GC): They exclusively performed crawl sessions. Swimming strokes group (GE): They underwent sessions of all the four swimming strokes. Results: After completing an eight-week intervention program, both groups enhanced their crawl technique. However, improvements observed in the GE were significantly greater than those achieved by the GC in the 25-metres crawl test (p <.001), stroke length (p=.006), average swimming speed (p=.000), and stroke index (p=.002). Conclusion: Practicing all four swimming strokes is more effective than crawl swimming only when it comes to improving the crawl technique in college-aged males.

Author Biographies

  • Pablo Prieto González, PRINCE SULTAN UNIVERSITY

    FACULTY MEMBER. PHYSICAL EDCUATION HEALTH AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. PRINCE SULTAN UNIVERSITY.

  • Jaromir Sedlacek, Faculty of Sport. University of Presov.
    Professor at Faculty of Sport. University of Presov

Downloads

Published

01-04-2021

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

Prieto González, P., & Sedlacek, J. (2021). Exclusive practice of crawl versus practicing the four swimming strokes on the improvement of crawl technique. Retos, 40, 250-256. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v1i40.76840