Availability and Usage of Electrophysical Agents by Portuguese Physiotherapists: an online Survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v57.104009Keywords:
Electrophysical agents, Physiotherapy, usage, TENS, US, availabilityAbstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the availability and usage of Electrophysical Agents (EPAs) by Portuguese Physiotherapists (PTs), and identify factors affecting its’ usage, such as PTs expertise, setting and autonomy.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out between July and September 2018. Physiotherapists currently practicing in Portugal were invited to complete an online survey. The online survey included questions regarding the participants' practice, such as years of experience, rehabilitation autonomy, number of clients per hour, context and availability and use of EPAs. Results: From a total of 544 PTs that responded to the survey, 424 (78 %) used EPAs on their daily practice. The most common available EPAs are Transcutaneous Eletrical Nerve Stimulation (99%) and Ultasound (91%). When available, more than 80% of the participants reported using the different EPAs at least one time. All participants reported using the different EPAs more than 80%, when they are available. PTs expertise does not influence the selection of EPAs however, the autonomy and setting influenced the selection of almost of the different EPAs. Discussion: EPAs are commonly available and generally used by Portuguese PTs. PTs that works autonomously tend to use less EPAs. The EPAs selection seems to be dependent on the setting, number of clients per hour and autonomy.
Keywords: Electrophysical agents, Physiotherapy, usage, availability; TENS; US
References
Abat, F., Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L., Martín-Nogueras, A. M., Calvo-Arenillas, J. I., Yajeya, J., Méndez-Sánchez, R., Monllau, J. C., & Gelber, P. E. (2016). Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) versus conventional electro-physiotherapeutic treatment on patellar tendinopathy. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 3(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4
Abe, Y., Goh, A. C., & Miyoshi, K. (2016). Availability, usage, and factors affecting usage of electrophysical agents by physical therapists: A regional cross-sectional survey. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(11), 3088–3094. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3088
Almeida, C. C. de, Silva, V. Z. M. da, Júnior, G. C., Liebano, R. E., & Durigan, J. L. Q. (2018). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current demonstrate similar effects in relieving acute and chronic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 22(5), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.12.005
Chipchase, L. S. (2012). Is there a future for electrophysical agents in musculoskeletal physiotherapy? Manual Therapy, 17(4), 265–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.04.001
Chipchase, L. S., Williams, M. T., & Robertson, V. J. (2008). Preparedness of new graduate Australian physiotherapists in the use of electrophysical agents. Physiotherapy, 94(4), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2008.09.003
Chipchase, L. S., Williams, M. T., & Robertson, V. J. (2009). A national study of the availability and use of electrophysical agents by Australian physiotherapists. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 25(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593980902782611
Dias, L. V., Cordeiro, M. A., Schmidt de Sales, R., dos Santos, M. M. B. R., Korelo, R. I. G., Vojciechowski, A. S., & de Mace do, A. C. B. (2021). Immediate analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential current (IFC) on chronic low back pain: Randomised placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 27, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.005
Fernández-Rodríguez, T., Fernández-Rolle, Á., Truyols-Domínguez, S., Benítez-Martínez, J. C., & Casaña-Granell, J. (2018). Prospective Randomized Trial of Electrolysis for Chronic Plantar Heel Pain. Foot and Ankle International, 39(9), 1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718773998
Forbes, R., Mandrusiak, A., Smith, M., & Russell, T. (2017). A comparison of patient education practices and perceptions of novice and experienced physiotherapists in Australian physiotherapy settings. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 28, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.01.007
Gandolfi, M., Geroin, C., Dimitrova, E., Boldrini, P., Waldner, A., Bonadiman, S., Picelli, A., Regazzo, S., Stirbu, E., Primon, D., Bosello, C., Gravina, A. R., Peron, L., Trevisan, M., Garcia, A. C., Menel, A., Bloccari, L., Valè, N., Saltuari, L., … Smania, N. (2017). Virtual Reality Telerehabilitation for Postural Instability in Parkinson’s Disease: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial. BioMed Research International, 2017, 11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7962826
Greco, J. L., Lamberg, E. M., McKenna, R. F., & Muratori, L. M. (2018). Trends in availability and usage of biophysical agents among physical therapists in the United States. Physical Therapy Reviews, 23(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2018.1449921
Houghton, P., Nussbaum, E., & Hoens, A. (2010). Electrophysical Agents: Contraindications And Precautions. Physiotherapy Canada, 62(5), 1–80.
Johnson, M. I., & Jones, G. (2017). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: current status of evidence. Pain Management, 7(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2016-0030
Kelly, G., Reilly, A., Moloney, H., Moran, J., Cunningham, C., & Broderick, J. (2018). 50 years of randomised controlled trials published in the journal Physiotherapy: a review 1967 to 2017. In Physiotherapy (United Kingdom) (Vol. 104, Issue 4, pp. 359–366). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.08.005
Kumaran, B., & Watson, T. (2019). Treatment using 448 kHz capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency improves pain and function in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint: a randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy (United Kingdom), 105(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.004
Mistry, D. (2019). Clinical decision making for use of eletro-physical agents by physical-therapy interns and post-graduate students of Ahmedabad, India: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Advanced Research, 7(6), 601–606. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9260
Moreno, C., Mattiussi, G., & Núñez, F. J. (2016). Therapeutic results after ultrasound-guided intratissue percutaneous electrolysis (EPI®) in the treatment of rectus abdominis-related groin pain in professional footballers: a pilot study - The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 October; The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 56(10), 1171–1178.
Niño, D. J. H., Pedro, K., Cardalda, I. M., & Oliveira, I. M. De. (2022). Electroestimulación funcional para miembros superiores tras el accidente cerebrovascular: una revisión sistemática. Retos, 46, 1073–1083.
Qaseem, A., Wilt, T. J., McLean, R. M., & Forciea, M. A. (2017). Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 166(7), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2367
Ramalingam, K. P., & Milanese, S. (2015). Physiotherapists’ perception on use of electrophysical agents: a developing country survey. Physiotherapy, 101(1), E1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.2090
Robertson, V. J. (2008). Electrophysical agents and research: from instinct to evidence. Physical Therapy Reviews, 13(6), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328808X374005
Salian, S. C., Rane, S., & Yardi, S. (2014). Use and Ownership of Electrophysical agents among Indian Physiotherapists | Semantic Scholar. Psychol Bull, 2(6), 992–1018.
Sánchez-Gómez, Á., Domínguez, R., Sañudo, B., & San Juan, A. F. (2022). Efectos de 8 semanas de ejercicio excéntrico y terapia de ondas de choque extracorpóreas sobre el tejido tendinoso, dolor percibido, potencia y fuerza muscular en atletas diagnosticados con tendinopatía rotuliana: un estudio longitudinal. Retos, 47, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v47.93378
Shah, S. G. S., & Farrow, A. (2012). Trends in the availability and usage of electrophysical agents in physiotherapy practices from 1990 to 2010: a review. Physical Therapy Reviews, 17(4), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743288X12Y.0000000007
Shah, S. G. S., Farrow, A., & Esnouf, A. (2007). Availability and use of electrotherapy devices: A survey. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 14(6), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2007.14.6.23895
Shields, N., Gormley, J., & O’Hare, N. (2001). Short-wave diathermy in Irish physiotherapy departments. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 8(9), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjtr.2001.8.9.13797
Springer, S., Laufer, Y., & Elboim-Gabyzon, M. (2015). Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13584-015-0015-X/TABLES/3
Watson, T. (2000). The role of electrotherapy in contemporary physiotherapy practice. Manual Therapy, 5(3), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1054/MATH.2000.0363
Watson, T. (2010). Key concepts with electrophysical agents. Physical Therapy Reviews, 15(4), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743288X10Y.0000000009
WCPT. (2018). Towards a new definition of electrophysical agents. International Society for Electrophysical Agents in Physical Therapy (ISEAPT). https://world.physio/subgroups/electrophysical. Acessed on july 19 2022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Retos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.