Diferencias entre el aprendizaje cooperativo y la asignación de tareas en la Escuela Rural. Comparación de dos estudios de caso en una unidad didáctica de acrosport en segundo ciclo de primaria (Differences between cooperative learning and practice style
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i18.34644Keywords:
Aprendizaje cooperativo, acrosport, socialización, motivación, estudio de caso (Cooperative learning, socialization, motivation, case study)Abstract
En estas líneas se presenta una investigación cualitativa en una escuela de ámbito rural dentro de la asignatura de educación física. El objeto de esta investigación es comprobar si hay diferencias significativas en la enseñanza del acrosport en función de la metodología empleada: aprendizaje cooperativo y asignación de tareas. Para ello se han utilizado diferentes instrumentos, con el fin de triangular los datos. Estos han sido: ranking sociométrico, examen práctico, hoja de evaluación trimestral del alumnado, cuestionario motivacional, y cuaderno del profesor. Entre los resultados se podría observar una mejora en el ranking sociométrico, en el aprendizaje creativo y en la percepción de la participación en clase de los grupos de aprendizaje cooperativo. Habiendo casos individuales dentro de estos grupos en los que la aceptación por los compañeros y el sentimiento de aceptación por el aprendiz mejoran con el aprendizaje cooperativo. Estos resultados son similares al de otros estudios de una duración más amplia.
Abstract: Through these lines it is presented a qualitative investigation in a rural school according to the Physical Education subject. The aim of this investigation is to check if there are any meaningful differences in the teaching of acrosport in accordance with the methodology used: cooperative learning and task assignment. To that effect, different instruments have been used in order to tally the information, which is: a ranking to see the social relationships among students, a practical exam, a pupil’s term evaluation sheet, a motivational question paper and a teacher’s notebook. Among the results, it could be observed an improvement in the social relationships ranking, in the creative learning and in the perception of the participation of cooperative learning groups. There are some individual facts in these groups where the acceptance from partners and the sense of acceptance from the learner improve with the cooperative learning. These results are similar to other studies which are longer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.