Perception of university students of Physical Education on the dialogue mark

Authors

  • Fernando Manuel Otero Saborido Universidad Pablo de Olavide
  • Francisco José Pozuelo-Estrada Universidad de Huelva
  • Constanza Palomino-Devia Universidad de Tolima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v43i0.89614

Keywords:

Formative assessment, feedback, self-regulated learning, flipped learning

Abstract

The dialogue score (DM) is a formative and shared assessment strategy for which there is little scientific evidence. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to analyze the perception of university students on the use of the DM within the flipped learning model. To do this, 144 students from the Degree in Physical Activity and Sports Sciences carried out a work project on sports initiation models. After a process of feeback and continuous evaluation of the task over three weeks, the students shared a DS session with their teacher to grade the work. The analysis of the interviews with the Atlas.ti software reflected the positive perception of the students towards DM. Students consider that it benefits learning and improves interaction with the teacher. Likewise, they believe that DM would have worsened if instead of using qualitative traits it had been negotiated on numerical ratings.

Author Biography

Fernando Manuel Otero Saborido, Universidad Pablo de Olavide

Profesor Contratado Doctor

Downloads

Published

2022-01-06

How to Cite

Otero Saborido, F. M., Pozuelo-Estrada, F. J., & Palomino-Devia, C. (2022). Perception of university students of Physical Education on the dialogue mark. Retos, 43, 300–308. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v43i0.89614

Issue

Vol. 43 (2022)

Section

Original Research Article

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Manuel Otero Saborido, Francisco José Pozuelo-Estrada, Constanza Palomino-Devia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
  2. Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).

This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.