Sedentary behavior and joint mobility in university students: a sex comparison

Authors

  • Josivaldo De Souza Lima Professor and researcher in Sports Coaching at Universidad Andrés Bello
  • Rodrigo Yañez-Sepulveda Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Instituto del Deporte y Bienestar, Universidad Andres Bello, Las Condes, Santiago 7550000, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9311-6576
  • Catalina Muñoz Strale Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Instituto del Deporte y Bienestar, Universidad Andres Bello, Las Condes, Santiago 7550000, Chile https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5354-1313
  • Javiera Alarcon-Aguilar Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Instituto del Deporte y Bienestar, Universidad Andres Bello, Las Condes, Santiago 7550000, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-046X
  • Maribel Parras-Saldias Universidad de Atacama, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5488-9878
  • Andrés Godoy Cumillaf Grupo de Investigación en Educación Física, Salud y Calidad de Vida (EFISAL), Facultad de Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-6838
  • Daniel Duclos-Bastias GEO Research Group, Escuela de Educación Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9020-5776
  • Frano Giakoni-Ramirez Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Instituto del Deporte y Bienestar, Universidad Andres Bello, Las Condes, Santiago 7550000, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2685-8991

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v76.117538

Keywords:

Joint range of motion, sedentary, behavior, students

Abstract

Background: University students are exposed to high levels of sedentary behavior (SB), which may negatively impact musculoskeletal health, including joint range of motion (ROM). However, evidence in young, healthy populations remains limited.

Objective: To examine the relationship between SB and hip joint ROM in Chilean university students, with particular attention to sex differences.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 189 students (89 men, 100 women; mean age: 21.6 ± 2.4 years). SB was assessed using the short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and hip ROM (flexion, extension, abduction) was measured with a digital goniometer under standardized conditions.

Results: Mean SB was 691 ± 42.6 minutes/day, exceedingly commonly accepted sedentary thresholds. No significant correlations were found between SB and hip ROM. Women demonstrated significantly greater hip flexion and abduction ROM than men (p < 0.05), while no sex differences were observed in hip extension.

Conclusion: Despite high levels of SB in this university population, no association with hip ROM was found. The observed sex differences in joint mobility align with known anatomical and behavioral variations. These findings highlight the need for longitudinal research using objective measures to better understand SB’s impact on joint health in young adults.

References

Bontrup, C., Taylor, W. R., Fliesser, M., Visscher, R., Green, T., Wippert, P. M., & Zemp, R. (2019, Nov). Low back pain and its relationship with sitting behaviour among sedentary office workers. Appl Ergon, 81, 102894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102894

Castro, O., Bennie, J., Vergeer, I., Bosselut, G., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2020, 2020-04-01). How Sedentary Are University Students? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prevention science, 21(3), 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8

Curotto-Winder, D. A., Becerra- Bravo, G., & Bravo-¬Cucci, S. (2022). Asociación entre el nivel de actividad física, sedentarismo y dolor de espalda en estudiantes de nutrición y dietética de una universidad de Lima en contexto de Pandemia por COVID-19 (Association between the level of physical activity, sedentary lifestyl. Retos, 45, 1019-1030. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v45i0.90979

de Rezende, L. F., Rodrigues Lopes, M., Rey-Lopez, J. P., Matsudo, V. K., & Luiz Odo, C. (2014). Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One, 9(8), e105620. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105620

Fanchamps, M. H. J., van den Berg-Emons, H. J. G., Stam, H. J., & Bussmann, J. B. J. (2017). Sedentary behavior: Different types of operationalization influence outcome measures. Gait Posture, 54, 188-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.02.025

Heneghan, N. R., Baker, G., Thomas, K., Falla, D., & Rushton, A. (2018). What is the effect of prolonged sitting and physical activity on thoracic spine mobility? An observational study of young adults in a UK university setting. BMJ Open, 8(5), e019371.

Herreros-Irarrázabal, D., González-López, M. F., Nuche-Salgado, R., de Souza-Lima, J., & Mahecha-Matsudo, S. (2024). Physical activity levels and sedentary behaviour according to sex, age, BMI, academic year, and country among medical students in Latin America. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1699.

Junger, J., Hrobacz, A., Melichar, R., & Salonna, F. (2025, 2025-01-01). PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR IN THE LIFESTYLE OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Health Problems of Civilization, 19(4), 427-439. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.2025.146804

Liao, Y., Liao, J., Durand, C. P., & Dunton, G. F. (2014, Mar). Which type of sedentary behaviour intervention is more effective at reducing body mass index in children? A meta-analytic review. Obes Rev, 15(3), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12112

Manini, T. M., Carr, L. J., King, A. C., Marshall, S., Robinson, T. N., & Rejeski, W. J. (2015, Jun). Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 47(6), 1306-1310. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000519

Marijančić, V., Šegulja, S., Vučković, M., Sović, I., Peharec, S., Grubić Kezele, T., & Starčević-Klasan, G. (2025). Gender Differences in the Relationship Between Fatigue, Different Types of Physical Activity, Postural Changes, and Sleep Quality in University Students—Part II Analyses from a Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 10(3), 307.

Oliveira, N., Keating, C. J., Chiu, C. Y., & Stavres, J. (2023). Increased hip flexion gait as an exercise modality for individuals with obesity. Eur J Appl Physiol, 123(10), 2157-2165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05227-y

Peterson, N. E., Sirard, J. R., Kulbok, P. A., DeBoer, M. D., & Erickson, J. M. (2018, Feb). Sedentary behavior and physical activity of young adult university students. Res Nurs Health, 41(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21845

Roberts, C. J., Ryan, D. J., Campbell, J., & Hardwicke, J. (2024). Self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour amongst UK university students: A cross-sectional case study. Critical Public Health, 34(1), 1-17.

Schaller, A., Rudolf, K., Dejonghe, L., Grieben, C., & Froboese, I. (2016). Influencing Factors on the Overestimation of Self-Reported Physical Activity: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Low Back Pain Patients and Healthy Controls. Biomed Res Int, 2016, 1497213. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1497213

Stępień, A., Maślanko, K., Kruk-Majtyka, W., & Gargas, G. (2025). Spinal Sagittal Alignment Assessment and Hip Range of Motion in Ambulatory Boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Reliability, Diagnosis and Implications for Physiotherapy Management. Healthcare, 13(19), 2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192392

Sun, Y., Wu, H., Zhang, X., Liu, J., Duan, L., Yang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2025). Sex and Limb Dominance Differences in Postural Control Performance of Young Adults: A Third-Order Polynomial Decay Approach. MDPI AG.

van Sluijs, E. M., Ekelund, U., Crochemore-Silva, I., Guthold, R., Ha, A., Lubans, D., Oyeyemi, A. L., Ding, D., & Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2021). Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention. The Lancet, 398(10298), 429-442.

Downloads

Published

14-01-2026

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

De Souza Lima, J., Yañez-Sepulveda, R., Muñoz Strale, C., Alarcon-Aguilar, J., Parras-Saldias, M., Godoy Cumillaf, A., Duclos-Bastias, D., & Giakoni-Ramirez, F. (2026). Sedentary behavior and joint mobility in university students: a sex comparison. Retos, 76, 292-299. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v76.117538