Intergenerational social innovation project "Cos_Avos": active aging through Physical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v76.117886Keywords:
Sport, elderly population, integration, education, discriminationAbstract
Introduction: The population of older adults grows exponentially, age discrimination, negative stereotypes and prejudice towards them are on the rise. To combat this, there is a need for proposals that enhance people’s perception of the older adults by presenting aging as a positive paradigm.
Objective: to generate empathy, collaboration, improved social relations, open-mindedness and initiative among older adults, children and adolescents.
Methodology: 767 school (8 to 16 years old), and 141 older adults (65 to 89 years old) took part of physical-sports activities carried out over a 10 days period in the social-health centers. To evaluate the effect of intergenerational project on the emotional, social, functional and cognitive dimensions of the participants, an ad hoc questionnaire was carried out.
Results: The results showed a significant positive effect (p<0.05) across all the groups, with the results obtained by the high school group (in the social, 5.00±0.00), cognitive (5.00±0.00) and emotional (4.90±0.12) dimensions) being particularly noteworthy.
Discussion: The results suggest that intergenerational physical-sport activities effectively reduce age-related stereotypes and promote mutual understanding. The emotional and social benefits observed align with existing literature emphasizing the value of shared movement and cooperation for psychological well-being. Future research should explore long-term effects and strategies for integrating these programs into education and community health.
Conclusions: The project received highly positive evaluations from both students and older adults, who highlighted increased empathy, creativity, and social responsibility, as well as enthusiasm for future participation.
References
Belgrave, M. (2011). The effect of a music therapy intergenerational program on children and older adults’ intergenerational interactions, cross-age attitudes, and older adults’ psychosocial well-being. Journal of Music Therapy, 48(4), 486–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/48.4.486
Bressler, J. (2001). The impact of intergenerational programs on long-term care residents. Gerontology, 41, 307.
Cassio, N., Gill, D., Owen, A. (2018). Cognitive changes following multiple-modality exercise and mind-motor training in older adults with subjective cognitive complaints: The M4 study. PLoS One, 13(4), e0196356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196356
Chen, Y., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Social support, social strain, loneliness, and well-being among older adults: An analysis of the Health and Retirement Study. Journal of Social and Personal Relation-ships, 31(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513488728
Corporation for National and Community Service. (2007). The health benefits of volunteering: A review of recent research. Washington, DC.
Cruzat Bravo, E., & Tauda Tauda, M. (2025). Actividad física y envejecimiento saludable: revisión sis-temática de evidencia en cohortes prospectivas. Retos, 74, 63-85. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v74.117489
Domènech-Abella, J., Díaz-Cofine, S., Rubio-Valera, M., & Aznar-Lou, I. (2022). Evaluación pre-post de un programa intergeneracional para mejorar el bienestar en personas mayores y los estereotip-os edadistas en alumnos de primaria y secundaria: proyecto CRENCO. Revista Española de Ger-iatría y Gerontología, 57(3), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2022.04.005
Dominguez, M.E. (2012) Programas intergeneracionales: reflexiones generales a través del análisis DAFO. Poiésis [Revista en internet] 2012. [Acceso 13 octubre 2023]; 24. Disponible en: http://www.funlam.edu.co/revistas/index.php/poiesis/index.
F. Araújo, M. B., Dalton-Alves, F., B. Lucena, B. E., Souto, G. C., D. Lopes, D. S., Oliveira, C. B. T., Sousa, V. L., Cavalcanti, L., Cabral, L. L. P., Ribeiro, F., Browne, R. A. V., & Caldas Costa, E. (2025). Efecto del ejercicio interválico al aire libre en la presión arterial de 24 horas en adultos mayores: estudio piloto. Retos, 71, 857-873. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v71.117303
Ferguson, L. (2012). Tackling loneliness in older age – Why we need action by all ages. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 13(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/14717791211283604
Fried, L. P., Carlson, M. C., Freedman, M., Frick, K. D., Glass, T. A., Hill, J., McGill, S., Rebok, G. W., Seeman, T., Tielsch, J., Wasik, B. A., & Zeger, S. (2004). A social model for health promotion for an aging population: Initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. Journal of Urban Health, 81(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jth094
Frith, E., Sng, E., & Loprinzi, P. D. (2017). Randomized controlled trial evaluating the temporal effects of high-intensity exercise on learning, short-term and long-term memory, and prospective memory. European Journal of Neuroscience, 46(10), 2557–2564. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13719
García, A. C., Sanz, D. I. P., & García, J. N. (2014). Los programas intergeneracionales en educación. En Avances en Ciencias de la Educación y del Desarrollo, II Congreso Internacional de Ciencias de la Educación y del Desarrollo, Granada (España), 25–27 de junio de 2014 (pp. 1209–1214). Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual AEPC.
Goff, K. (2004). Senior to senior: Living lessons. Educational Gerontology, 30(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270490272133
Granville, G. (2022) A Review of Intergenerational Practice I the UK. Stoke-on-Trent: Beth Johnson Foundation.
Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., & Steffens, N. K. (2018). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. Psychology Press.
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment effects on adult cogni-tive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psy-chological Science in the Public Interest, 9(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x
Huxhold, O., Miche, M., & Schüz, B. (2014). Benefits of having friends in older ages: Differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older adults. Journals of Geron-tology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(3), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt084
Jarrott, S. E., Scrivano, R. M., Park, C., & Mendoza, A. N. (2021). Implementation of evidence-based prac-tices in intergenerational programming: A scoping review. Research on aging, 43(7-8), 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027521996191
Kaplan, M., Higdon, F., Crago, N., & Robbins, L. (2004). Futures festivals: An intergenerational strategy for promoting community participation. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2(3–4), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1300/J194v02n03_08
Kuehne, V. (2005). Intergenerational strategies series. Making What Difference? How Intergenerational Programs help children and families. Elders as resources. Baltimore: The Annie E. Casey Foun-dation.
Lambert, D. J., Dellmann-Jenkins, M., & Fruit, D. (1990). Planning for contact between the generations: An effective approach. The Gerontologist, 30(4), 553–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/30.4.553
Levy, S. R., & Macdonald, J. L. (2016). Progress on understanding ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 72(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12153
MacCallum, J., Palmer, D., Wright, P., Cumming-Potvin, W., Northcote, J., & Brooker, M. (2006). Com-munity building through intergenerational exchange programs. Pastoral Psychology, 60, 99–105.
Macdonald, J., & Levy, S. R. (2021). Addressing stereotypes of aging and interest in careers working with older adults through education. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 42(3), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2020.1854246
Machielse, A., & Duyndam, J. (2020). Strategies of socially isolated older adults: Mechanisms of emer-gence and persistence. Journal of Aging Studies, 53, 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100852
Manheimer, R.J. (1997): «Generations learning together». En Brabazon, K., & Disch, R. (eds.): Intergen-erational approaches in aging. Nueva York: The Haworth Press, pp. 79-91.
Martin, K., Springate, I., & Atkinson, M. (2010). Intergenerational Practice: Outcomes and Effectiveness. LGA Research Report. National Foundation for Educational Research. The Mere, Upton Park, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 2DQ, UK.
Marx, M. S., Hubbard, P., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Dakheel-Ali, M., & Thein, K. (2004). Community-service activities versus traditional activities in an intergenerational visiting program. Educational Gerontology, 31(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270390242322
Merz, E. M., & Huxhold, O. (2010). Well-being depends on social relationship characteristics: Comparing different types and providers of support to older adults. Ageing & Society, 30(5), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X09990798
Newman, S., & Hatton-Yeo, A. (2008). Intergenerational learning and the contributions of older people. Ageing Horizons, 8(10), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.14256/JAE.2008.8.10
Newman, S., Karip, E., & Faux, R. B. (1995). Everyday memory function of older adults: the impact of intergenerational school volunteer programs. Educational Gerontology, 21(6), 569-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127950210603
Ng, R., Allore, H. G., Trentalange, M., Monin, J. K., & Levy, B. R. (2015). Increasing negativity of age stere-otypes across 200 years: Evidence from a database of 400 million words. PloS One, 10, e0117086. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117086
O´Connor, M. (2012). A Terror Management Perspective on young Adults´ Ageism and Attitudes To-ward Dementia. Educational Gerontology, 38(9), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2011.595335
Osborne, S., Janis, R., & Bullock, S. (2000). Intergenerational programming in action: Befrienders. Edu-cational Gerontology, 26(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/036012700278877
Rojas, P. N. (2024). Políticas de las comunidades autónomas para la conciliación de la vida laboral y familiar: El papel de las administraciones públicas en el fomento de la corresponsabi-lidad. Revista Derecho Social y Empresa, (20), 44-67. https://doi.org/10.18172/redsye.6258
Ruiz-Montero, E. E., Chiva-Bartoll, Ó., Sánchez-Trigo, H., & Montero, P. J. R. (2025). Prosocialidad y per-cepción de la Educación Física en alumnado de Educación Primaria: el diario reflexivo. Apren-dizaje-servicio Intergeneracional. Retos, 71, 655-668. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v71.116938
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Santini, S., Tombolesi, V., Baschiera, B., & Lamura, G. (2018). Intergenerational Programs Involving Adolescents, Institutionalized Elderly, and Older Volunteers: Results from a Pilot Research‐Action in Italy. BioMed research international, 2018(1), 4360305. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4360305
Shedletsky, L. (2012). Undergraduates mentoring older adults: Breaking stereotypes. Journal of Inter-generational Relationships, 10(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2012.736270
Teater, B. (2016). Intergenerational programs to promote active aging: The experiences and perspec-tives of older adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 40(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2015.1137662
Velarte, M. G., Blasco, C. B., García, L. R. G., Duarte, Y. M., Sacramento, A. C. G., & Fuertes, P. G. (2021). Los programas intergeneracionales. Metodología, beneficios y situación en España. Revista Sani-taria de Investigación, 2(11), 436. https://doi.org/10.6018/rsid.2.11.466701
Ventura-Merkel, C y Lidoff, L. (1983): Program Innovation in aging Community Planning for Intergen-erational Programming. Whashingtonn, DC: National Council on Aging. Núm. 8.
Webster, M., Norwood, K., Waterworth, J., & Leavey, G. (2024). Effectiveness of intergenerational ex-change programs between adolescents and older adults: A systematic review. Journal of Inter-generational Relationships, 22(4), 603-644. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2023.2267532
Whear, R., Campbell, F., Rogers, M., Sutton, A., Robinson‐Carter, E., Sharpe, R., ... & Thompson‐Coon, J. (2023). What is the effect of intergenerational activities on the wellbeing and mental health of older people? A systematic review. Campbell systematic reviews, 19(4), e1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1355
Whitehouse, P. (2013). The Challenges of Cognitive Aging: Integrating Approaches from Neuroscience to Intergenerational Relationships. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 11 (2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2013.782740
Villar, F., Celdrán, M., & Serrat, R. (2021). Intergenerational programs and active aging: Mechanisms, outcomes, and future directions. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 19(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2021.1877512
World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Decade of healthy ageing: Baseline report. WHO. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017900
World Health Organization (WHO). (February, 2018). Ageing and health. Retrieved from https:// www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.
Young, T. L., & Janke, M. (2011). Older Adults’ Perceived Benefits and Concerns in an Intergenerational Program: the Linc Project. Gerontologist, 51, 600.
Zapata-Gil, S., Rivas-Campo, Y., Santiago-Mejía, D., & Afanador-Restrepo, D. F. (2026). Deterioro cogniti-vo leve y alteración en la función física, cognitiva e independencia funcional de adultos mayores institucionalizados en Cali. Retos, 74, 450-458. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v74.117708
Zhong, S., Lee, C., Foster, M. J., & Bian, J. (2020). Intergenerational communities: A systematic literature review of intergenerational interactions and older adults' health-related outcomes. Social Sci-ence & Medicine, 264, 113374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113374
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Angel Casal Moldes, Adriana Lopez Rodriguez, Jose Mª Cancela Carral

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.