Psychometric properties of the Thai Mental Toughness Inventory (MTI-12): evidence from elite athletes in a Southeast Asian context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v78.118968Keywords:
Confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invarance, mental toughness, psychometric validation, Thai elite athletesAbstract
Introduction: Athletes’ psychological ability to maintain consistent performance under competitive pressure has often been described as mental toughness. The Mental Toughness Inventory (MTI) is perhaps the most widely used psychometric instrument for measuring athletes’ mental toughness. However, MTI’s factorial validity and measurement invariance have yet to be tested outside of Western sport settings.
Objective: To confirm the factorial validity and reliability of the Thai MTI-12, assess measurement invariance across gender, age groups, sport type, and sport classification, and test for latent mean differences among groups.
Method: Four hundred and eight Thai elite athletes (53.2% male; Mean Age = 22.52 years, SD = 5.93) from 32 sports participated. Confirmatory factor analysis and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to assess factorial validity and measurement invariance.
Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized 12-item unidimensional model with good model-data fit. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses revealed full scalar invariance across athlete groups. Latent mean analyses indicated that female athletes (ΔM = −0.27, p < .001) had significantly greater global mental toughness than males, and older athletes demonstrated higher goal commitment and stress regulation.
Discussion: The Thai MTI-12 demonstrated strong factorial validity, supported its unidimensional factor structure, and showed scalar equivalence across athlete subgroups. Three culturally unique expressions of mental toughness emerged: collectivist obedience (kreng jai), perseverance through difficulty (khwam-othon), and Buddhist contemplative practices (equanimity and present-moment awareness).
Conclusions: The Thai MTI-12 demonstrates strong psychometric properties and provides a culturally sensitive instrument for measuring mental toughness among elite Thai athletes and Southeast Asian populations.
References
Aditya, R. S., Rahmatika, Q. T., AlMutairi, R. I., Alruwaili, A. S., Astuti, E. S., & Fadila, R. (2024). Mental toughness may have an impact on athlete's performance: Systematic review. Retos, 56, 328–337. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v56.103768
Akbar, A., Abd Karim, Z., Zakaria, J., Suryanef, Cahyani, F. I., Rahman, M. A., Hamzah, N. B., & Mohamad, S. K. B. (2024). Understanding mental toughness in student-athletes: Insights from sport psychology. Retos, 54, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v54.102230
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Clough, P., Earle, K., & Sewell, D. (2002). Mental toughness: The concept and its measurement. In I. Cockerill (Ed.), Solutions in sport psychology (pp. 32–45). Thomson Learning. [No DOI available for book chapter]
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gordon, S., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2011). Introduction to mental toughness in sport. In D. F. Gucciardi & S. Gordon (Eds.),
Mental toughness in sport: Developments in theory and research (pp. 1–15). Routledge. [No DOI available for book chapter]
Gucciardi, D. F. (2009). Do developmental differences in mental toughness exist between specialized and diversified sport participants? Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(14), 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903171305
Gucciardi, D. F., & Jones, M. I. (2012). Beyond optimal performance: Mental toughness profiles and developmental success in athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(17), 1681–1698. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.701759
Gucciardi, D. F., Hanton, S., Gordon, S., Mallett, C. J., & Temby, P. (2015). The concept of mental toughness: Tests of dimensionality, nomological network, and traitness. Journal of Personality, 83(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12079
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Jones, G., Hanton, S., & Connaughton, D. (2002). What is this thing called mental toughness? An investigation of elite sport performers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200290103509
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Julvanichpong, T., Vongjaturapat, N., & Julvanichpong, W. (2010). The development of Thai mental toughness inventory. Journal of Exercise and Sport Science, 7(2). https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/buuss/article/view/86872
Julvanichpong, T., Patthamontri, C., & Singnoy, C. (2024). Mental preparedness of athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the training of Thai national team for the 19th Asian Games. International Journal of Religion, 5(7), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.61707/n8230866
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
Middleton, S. C., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., Richards, G. E., & Perry, C. (2005). Developing the Mental Toughness Inventory (MTI). In Proceedings of the 2005 ISSP World Congress of Sport Psychology (pp. 62–66). International Society of Sport Psychology. [No DOI available for conference proceedings]
Putra, M. F. P., Kurdi, Syahruddin, S., Hasibuan, S., Sinulingga, A., Kamaruddin, I., Kristiyandaru, A., Mashud, Hariadi, I., Guntoro, T. S., Sutoro, Sinaga, E., Ibrahim, & Setiawan, E. (2024). An Indonesian version of the Mental Toughness Index: Testing psychometric properties in athletes and non-athletes. Retos, 55, 816–824. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v55.106086
Putra, M. F. P., Wanena, T., Wandik, Y., Womsiwor, D., Dike, I. M., Mulait, C., & Pahabol, N. (2024). Mental toughness: Are there differences between athletes and non-athletes, education levels, and gender? Retos, 58, 516–521. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v58.107330
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
Wandik, Y., Dina, Guntoro, T. S., Sutoro, Wambrauw, O. O. O., Abidjulu, C. F., & Putra, M. F. P. (2024). Interrelation of mental toughness, religiosity, and happiness of elite adolescent athletes based on gender, type of sport, and level of education. Retos, 57, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v57.103765
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tanida Julvanichpong, Chatkamon Singnoy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
