T test vs categorical analysis: evolution of agility in older adults following two years of training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i39.77956Keywords:
aging, detraining, dual task, functional independenceAbstract
Abstrat. Exercise training does not ensure functional independence among elders, neither detraining means to lose it, so 4 categories where designed in order to analyse the long-term effects of a multicomponent physical-cognitive training program over their users’ functional independence. A total of 25 healthy elders (69.74±5.36 years old) were assessed during two years, including 2 periods of training (T1, T2; 8 months each one) and detraining (D1, D2; 3 months + 1 of testing). Agility (Time Up&Go Test) was analysed because of its relationship with gait and fall-prevention. The exact Fisher’s test was considered to analzse between-period category changes, followed by a Repeated Measures ANOVA, to compare the results in both approaches. Although agility showed significant improvements following training, larger in T1 compared to T2, the percentage of independent participants was higher in T2. In terms of detraining, paired comparison showed larger losses during D2. However, more than half of participants reached the physical independence during this second period. Both analyses are complementary and clarify the long-term benefits of this training program for the agility of the elderly population.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.