Digital twins in sports performance: an overview of reviews of technologies, application domains, and computational frameworks

Authors

  • Carlos Alberto Castillo Daza GIBIOME Research Group, Study Center in Biomedical and Biotechnology Engineering, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito, Bogotá, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-7320
  • Luis Eduardo Rodríguez Cheu GIBIOME Research Group, Study Center in Biomedical and Biotechnology Engineering, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito, (Bogotá, Colombia) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-1167

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v83.119619

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Biomechanical Analysis, Digital Twins, Machine Learning, Sports Performance

Abstract

Introduction: Digital twins represent a multidisciplinary opportunity for precision medicine and sports performance optimization; however, there is still a lack of a comprehensive synthesis of the methodologies, enabling technologies, and conceptual frameworks applied in these fields.

Objective: To review the state of the art of digital twin applications in health and sport from 2009 to 2025, identifying key technologies, application domains, and major research gaps.

Methodology: A review of reviews was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the PRIOR Statement. Twenty-one studies were included (12 systematic reviews, 6 scoping reviews, 2 narrative reviews, and 1 meta-review). Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2.

Results: The main technologies identified were conceptual frameworks (28%), artificial intelligence and machine learning (24%), neuromusculoskeletal modeling (20%), wearable devices and IoT (20%), and motion capture systems (16%). The most frequent application domains were sports performance (32%), injury prevention (20%), rehabilitation (20%), general health (16%), and occupational ergonomics (12%). Methodological quality was heterogeneous: 28% of the reviews showed moderate confidence, while 72% presented low or critically low quality.

Conclusions: The findings reveal technological fragmentation and a gap between computational development and clinical validation. Although digital twins demonstrate high clinical and engineering potential, their implementation requires greater prospective validation, standardization of metrics, and robust evaluation frameworks.

References

Al Ardha, M. A., Nurhasan, N., Supriyanto, C., Yang, C. B., Bikalawans, S. S., Simanjuntak, F. Y., & Rizki, V. A. D. (2026). Perspectivas biomecánicas y fisiológicas en el entrenamiento del salto de altura: una revisión sistemática. Retos, 77, 497-511. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v77.118209

Alahaidib, A. A., Alyousef, H. Y., Sharif, M. A., Alsulaiman, A. K., Alharthi, T. S., Aljohani, H. I., … Almehizia, A. A. (2025). Biomechanical assessment tools for injury risk prediction and return-to-sport evaluation in athletes: A systematic review. Cureus, 17(9), e93210. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93210

Attaran, M., & Celik, B. G. (2023). Digital twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities. Deci-sion Analytics Journal, 6, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165

Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E., & Fogli, D. (2019). A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE Access, 7, 167653–167671. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953499

Bispo, M. D. C., Almeida-Santos, M. A., Gomes, A. C., Alves, M. D. C., & Dantas, E. H. M. (2024). Estableci-miento de la validez del “Sports Talent®”: una metodología para la detección de talentos moto-res en el deporte. Retos, 59, 1140-1148. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v59.102864

Botín-Sanabria, D. M., Mihaita, A.-S., Peimbert-García, R. E., Ramírez-Moreno, M. A., Ramírez-Mendoza, R. A., & Lozoya-Santos, J. de J. (2022). Digital twin technology challenges and applications: A comprehensive review. Remote Sensing, 14(6), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061335

Comisión Europea. (2014). Technology readiness levels (TRL). Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014–2015, General Annexes, G. Publications Office of the European Union.

Douglass, K., Lamb, A., Lu, J., Ono, K., & Tenpas, W. (2024). Swimming in data. The Mathematical Intelli-gencer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-024-10339-0

Franzò, M., Pica, A., Pascucci, S., Marinozzi, F., & Bini, F. (2023). Hybrid system mixed reality and mark-er-less motion tracking for sports rehabilitation of martial arts athletes. Applied Sciences, 13(4), 2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042587

Gámez Díaz, R., Yu, Q., Ding, Y., Laamarti, F., & El Saddik, A. (2020). Digital twin coaching for physical activities: A survey. Sensors, 20(20), 5936. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205936

Gates, M., Gates, A., Pieper, D., Fernandes, R. M., Tricco, A. C., Moher, D., … Hartling, L. (2022). Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: Development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ, 378, e070849. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070849

Grieves, M. (2014). Digital twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication [White paper]. Florida Institute of Technology.

Haddad, Y. S., Kharashqah, R. F., Ababaneh, A. Y., Bataineh, R. R., Alwedyan, T. A., Alzu’bi, M. F., Bani Hani, S., Kulaep, H. F., & Al-Sababha, L. K. (2026). Estudio comparativo de métodos de rehabilitación tradicionales frente a los asistidos por IA para lesiones de miembros inferiores en jugadores de baloncesto: seguimiento semiexperimental de 12 meses. Retos, 74, 833-844. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v74.118127

He, Q., Li, L., Li, D., Peng, T., Zhang, X., Cai, Y., Zhang, X., & Tang, R. (2024). From digital human modeling to human digital twin: Framework and perspectives in human factors. Chinese Journal of Me-chanical Engineering, 37, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-024-00998-7

Hliš, T., Fister, I., & Fister, I., Jr. (2024). Digital twins in sport: Concepts, taxonomies, challenges and practical potentials. Expert Systems with Applications, 258, 125104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125104

ISO. (2013). ISO 16290:2013. Space systems — Definition of the technology readiness levels (TRLs) and their criteria of assessment. International Organization for Standardization.

Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018). Digital twin in manufacturing: A cate-gorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Bio-metrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Lloyd, D. G., Saxby, D. J., Pizzolato, C., Worsey, M., Diamond, L. E., Bourne, M., … Feldman, S. (2023). Maintaining soldier musculoskeletal health using personalised digital humans, wearables and/or computer vision. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 26(Suppl. 1), S30–S39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2023.04.001

Mănescu, D. C. (2025). Inteligencia artificial en el entrenamiento deportivo de élite y perspectiva de su integración en el deporte escolar. Retos, 73, 128–141. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v73.117261

Mao, W., Hu, Y., Yang, X., Ren, W., & Fang, H. (2024). ARE-Platform: An augmented reality-based ergo-nomic evaluation solution for smart manufacturing. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2173894

Mikołajewska, E., Masiak, J., & Mikołajewski, D. (2024). Applications of artificial intelligence-based pa-tient digital twins in decision support in rehabilitation and physical therapy. Electronics, 13(24), 4994. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13244994

Miller, M. E., & Spatz, E. (2022). A unified view of a human digital twin. Human-Intelligent Systems In-tegration, 4(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-022-00041-x

Mohamed Refai, M. I., Moya-Esteban, A., & Sartori, M. (2024). Electromyography-driven musculoskele-tal models with time-varying fatigue dynamics improve lumbosacral joint moments during lift-ing. Journal of Biomechanics, 164, 111987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111987

Nobari, H. (2024). Takes two to tango: Digital twins and AI revolutionize sports science and medicine [Editorial]. Acta Kinesiologica, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2024.18.2.7

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Park, J.-S., Lee, D.-G., Jimenez, J. A., Lee, S.-J., & Kim, J.-W. (2023). Human-focused digital twin applica-tions for occupational safety and health in workplaces: A brief survey and research directions. Applied Sciences, 13(7), 4598. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074598

Pellegrino, G., Gervasi, M., Angelelli, M., & Corallo, A. (2025). A conceptual framework for digital twin in healthcare: Evidence from a systematic meta-review. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10536-4

Saxby, D. J., Pizzolato, C., & Diamond, L. E. (2023). A digital twin framework for precision neuromuscu-loskeletal health care: Extension upon industrial standards. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 39(5), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0114

Scano, A., Lanzani, V., & Brambilla, C. (2024). How recent findings in electromyographic analysis and synergistic control can impact on new directions for muscle synergy assessment in sports. Ap-plied Sciences, 14(23), 11360. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311360

Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., … Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised stud-ies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008

Souaifi, M., Dhahbi, W., Jebabli, N., Ceylan, H. İ., Boujabli, M., Muntean, R. I., & Dergaa, I. (2025). Artificial intelligence in sports biomechanics: A scoping review on wearable technology, motion analysis, and injury prevention. Bioengineering, 12(8), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12080887

Sun, T., Wang, J., Suo, M., Liu, X., Huang, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., & Li, Z. (2023). The digital twin: A poten-tial solution for the personalized diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal system diseases [Perspective]. Bioengineering, 10(6), 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060627

Tao, F., Qi, Q., Wang, L., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twins and cyber-physical systems toward smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison. Engineering, 5(4), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.014

Uhlenberg, L., & Amft, O. (2023). Co-simulation of human digital twins and wearable inertial sensors to analyse gait event estimation. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 1104000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1104000

Yao, J.-F., Yang, Y., Wang, X.-C., & Zhang, X.-P. (2023). Systematic review of digital twin technology and applications. Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, 6, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-023-00137-4

Yunus, M., & Aditya, R. S. (2024). Búsqueda de talentos y estandarización de datos de aptitud física en clubes de fútbol: revisión sistemática. Retos, 60, 1382-1389. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.107767

Downloads

Published

30-05-2026

Issue

Section

Theoretical systematic reviews and/or meta-analysis

How to Cite

Castillo Daza, C. A., & Rodríguez Cheu, L. E. (2026). Digital twins in sports performance: an overview of reviews of technologies, application domains, and computational frameworks. Retos, 83, 576-589. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v83.119619