Regulatory inertia in sports confederations: the impact of statutory omission on the performance of athletes' commissions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v73.116824Keywords:
Sports governance, athlete representation, democracy in sport, athletes' commissions, statutesAbstract
Introduction: Recent concerns regarding sports management have driven the pursuit of more democratic processes, aiming for greater transparency and the active participation of athletes in decisions that directly affect them.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the main characteristics of the electoral process of athletes’ committees in Brazilian Olympic sports confederations, assessing the degree of institutionalization and effectiveness of this representation in light of democratic governance.
Methodology: The research was conducted through a qualitative documentary analysis involving the bylaws and internal regulations of the 34 confederations linked to the Brazilian Olympic Committee. Four indicators were defined for analysis: committee competence, term of office, possibility of reappointment, and voting method.
Results: The findings indicate a significant lack of regulation: only 29.41% of the confederations formally describe the committees’ competences.
Discussion: A lack of succession planning and gaps in the regulation of athletes’ participation were also observed, which weakens their deliberative role and consolidates a predominantly symbolic representation model.
Conclusions: The analysis of the electoral process for athlete representation in Brazilian sports confederations revealed a lack of clear regulation regarding their competencies, requiring greater transparency, strategic planning, and training for effective democratic governance.
References
Bitencourt, C. M., & Pase, E. S. (2015). A necessária relação entre democracia e controle social: Discutindo os possíveis reflexos de uma democracia “não amadurecida” na efetivação do controle social da administração pública [The necessary relationship between democracy and social control: Discussing the possible reflections of an immature democracy in the implementation of social control of public administration]. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 2(1), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i1.43663
Bobbio, N. (1997). O futuro da democracia: Uma defesa das regras do jogo [The future of democracy: A defense of the rules of the game]. Coleção Pensamento Crítico.
Bobbio, N. (2000). Liberalismo e democracia [Liberalism and democracy] (6a ed.; M. A. Nogueira, Trad.). Brasiliense.
Bourdieu, P. (1983). Sociologie du sport. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, (46).
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Questions de sociologie. Minuit.
Carrio, A., Geeraert, A., Ham, E., Harvey, A., & Zohn, A. (2021). Strengthening athlete power in sport: A multidisciplinary review and framework. Play The Game, 1(September), 63.
Chappelet, J.-L., & Bayle, E. (2005). Strategic and performance management of Olympic sport organisations. Human Kinetics.
Cotterill, S. T., & Fransen, K. (2016). Athlete leadership in sport teams: Current understanding and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 9(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2015.1124443
Damo, A. S. (2007). Do dom à profissão: A formação de futebolistas no Brasil e na França [From gift to profession: The training of football players in Brazil and France]. Hucitec.
Damo, A. S. (2010). Futebol e poder: Considerações a partir de Pierre Bourdieu [Football and power: Considerations based on Pierre Bourdieu]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte, 31(2), 61–76.
De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., & Shibli, S. (2006). A conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(2), 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740600955087
Ferkins, L., Coakley, J., Hallinan, C., Jackson, S., & Mewett, P. (2010). Sports in society: Issues and controversies in Australia and New Zealand. Sport Management Review, 13(4), 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2009.10.004
Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le système: Les contraintes de l’action collective. Éditions du Seuil.
Grigaliūnaitė, I., & Eimontas, E. (2018). Athletes’ involvement in decision making for good governance in sport. Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 3(110), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v3i110.247
Houlihan, B. (2004). Civil rights, doping control and the world anti-doping code. Sport in Society, 7(3), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743042000291712
IBGC. (2011). Guia de orientação para planejamento de sucessão, avaliação e remuneração de conselho de administração e diretor-presidente [Guidance guide for succession planning, evaluation and remuneration of board of directors and CEO] (1a ed.).
IBGC. (2013). Código de conduta do IBGC [IBGC Code of Conduct].
IBGC. (2015). Código das melhores práticas de governança corporativa [Code of best practices for corporate governance] (5a ed.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
IOC. (2021). Olympic charter.
Kihl, L. A., Kikulis, L. M., & Thibault, L. (2007). A deliberative democratic approach to athlete-centred sport: The dynamics of administrative and communicative power. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740701270287
Lei nº 9.615 de 24 de março de 1998. (1998). Institui normas gerais sobre desporto e dá outras providências [Establishes general rules on sports and provides other measures].
Leite, M. O. (2023). Comissão de atletas das confederações olímpicas brasileiras: Uma análise sobre a estrutura de participação do atleta [Athletes' Commission of the Brazilian Olympic Confederations: An analysis of the athlete's participation structure] [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Universidade Federal do Paraná.
Madella, A., Bayle, E., & Tome, J.-L. (2005). The organisational performance of national swimming federations in Mediterranean countries: A comparative approach. European Journal of Sport Science, 5(4), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390500344644
Marconi, M. de A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2017). Fundamentos de metodologia científica [Fundamentals of scientific methodology] (8a ed.). Editora Atlas.
Martins, M. Z., & Reis, H. H. B. dos. (2017). Poder, transparência e democracia nas gestões esportivas [Power, transparency and democracy in sports management]. CartaCapital. Recuperado de http://www.cartacapital.com.br/sociedade/entenda-o-escandalo-da-fifa-e-da-cbf-4139.html
Mazzei, L. C., & Bastos, F. da C. (2012). Gestão do esporte no Brasil: Desafios e perspectivas [Sports management in Brazil: Challenges and perspectives] (1a ed.). Ícone.
McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2009). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 21–47). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891025
McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2009). The communicative constitution of organizations. Routledge.
Mezzadri, F. M., Haas, L. G. N., Neto, R. da C. S., & Santos, T. de O. S. (2018). Cartilha de governança em entidades esportivas Lei 9.615/98 [Governance handbook in sports entities Law 9.615/98]. Ministério do Esporte.
Monks, R. A., & Minow, N. (2011). Corporate governance. John Wiley & Sons.
Pires, G. L. (2005). Cultura esportiva [Sports culture]. In P. Fensterseifer & F. Gonzales (Orgs.), Dicionário crítico da educação física [Critical Dictionary of Physical Education]. Unijuí.
Presidência. (2016). Legislação sobre o terceiro setor [Legislation on the third sector].
Robinson, L., & Minikin, B. (2011). Developing strategic capacity in Olympic sport organisations. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 1(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426781111162648
Sá-Silva, J. R., Domingos de Almeida, C., & Guindani, J. F. (2009). Pesquisa documental: Pistas teóricas e metodológicas [Documentary research: Theoretical and methodological approaches]. Revista Brasileira de História & Ciências Sociais, 1–14. Recuperado de www.rbhcs.com
Senado Federal, S. de E. T. (2008). Código Civil Brasileiro e legislação correlata [Brazilian Civil Code and related legislation].
Shilbury, D., Soutiriadou, K. P., & Green, B. C. (2008). Sport development. systems, policies and pathways: An introduction to the special issue. Sport Management Review, 11(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3523(08)70110-4
Silva, O. G. T. (2003). Esporte, movimento olímpico e democracia: O atleta como mediador [Sport, Olympic movement and democracy: The athlete as mediator].
Slack, T., & Parent, M. M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory. Human Kinetics.
Taylor, T., & Robinson, L. (2019). Succession and good governance. In Research handbook on sport governance. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434821.00037
Thibault, L., Kihl, L., & Babiak, K. (2010). Democratization and governance in international sport: Addressing issues with athlete involvement in organizational policy. International Journal of Sport Policy, 2(3), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2010.507211
UOL. (2021, 20 de janeiro). Comissões de atletas sofrem resistência para manter autonomia [Athlete commissions face resistance to maintain autonomy]. UOL Esporte. Recuperado de https://www.uol.com.br/esporte/colunas/diogo-silva/2021/01/20/comissoes-de-atletas-sofrem-resistencia-para-manter-autonomia.htm
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marcelo Oliveira Leite, Mayara Torres Ordonhes, Fernando Marinho Mezzadri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
