Validation of the Chilean perceived physical literacy instrument (Ch-PPLI) questionnaire in Chilean girls, boys and adolescents between 10 and 18 years old

Authors

  • Mauricio Inostroza-Mondaca Departamento de Kinesiología, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, región Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-2079
  • Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute. School of Physical Therapy. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences. Universidad Andres Bello. Santiago, 7591538, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2035-3279
  • Antonio García-Hermoso Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1397-7182
  • Carolina Pardo Tamayo Escuela de Ciencias del Deporte, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Santiago, Chile. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2091-2584
  • Fernando Muñoz-Hinrichsen Departamento de Kinesiología, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Santiago, Chile.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v65.110545

Keywords:

Physical Activity, Literacy, Motor Development, Physical Education

Abstract

Introduction: Motor literacy promotes participation and maintenance of adequate levels of physical activity throughout the life cycle, reduces sedentary behavior, and improves health markers and quality of life in children and adolescents (NNA). Therefore, valid and reliable instruments are required to determine motor literacy in NNA).

Objective: To examine the validity and reliability of the "Chilean Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument" (Ch-PPLI) questionnaire in Chilean children and adolescents aged 10 to 18.

Methodology: A process of cultural adaptation and content validation was developed with three experts using the Delphi methodology, content validation coefficient, and construct validation by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), with female participants (n=134; 13.8±2.05 years) and male participants (n=146; 14.4±2.17 years).

Results: The expert validation presented content validation coefficients between 0.81 and 0.94 (i.e., “good” to “excellent”). The model fit measures presented “satisfactory” values ​​(Root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA=0.07; p<0.001]). The EFA grouped items into one factor, presenting “high” reliability values ​​(α=0.822 and ω=0.829). In items 1 to 5 and the total Ch-PPLI, boys presented higher values ​​than girls (all p<0.05). In items 2 to 5, 7, 9, and the total Ch-PPLI, the active population (physical activity level questionnaire >5 points) presented higher values ​​versus the physically inactive population (all p<0.05).Discussion: Compare the research results with other findings from the literature.

Conclusions: The Ch-PPLI showed validity and reliability in Chilean children from 10 to 18 years old. The Ch-PPLI identified differences in motor literacy between men and women and between physically active and inactive individuals.

References

Araujo Jiménez, E. A., Jané-Ballabriga, M. C., Bonillo Martin, A., & Capdevilla i Brophy, C. (2014). Executive Function Deficits and Symptoms of Disruptive Behaviour Disorders in Preschool Children %J Universitas Psychologica. 13, 1267-1277.

Aubert, S., Barnes, J. D., Demchenko, I., Hawthorne, M., Abdeta, C., Abi Nader, P., . . . Tremblay, M. S. (2022). Global Matrix 4.0 Physical Activity Report Card Grades for Children and Adolescents: Results and Analyses From 57 Countries. J Phys Act Health, 19(11), 700-728. doi:10.1123/jpah.2022-0456

Belanger, K., Barnes, J. D., Longmuir, P. E., Anderson, K. D., Bruner, B., Copeland, J. L., . . . Tremblay, M. S. (2018). The relationship between physical literacy scores and adherence to Canadian physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines. BMC Public Health, 18(Suppl 2), 1042. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5897-4

Brummer, J. J. & Philosophy Documentation Center. (1985). A Delphi Method of Teaching Applied Philosophy: Teaching Philosophy, 8(3), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil19858381

Cairney, J., Dudley, D., Kwan, M., Bulten, R., & Kriellaars, D. (2019). Physical Literacy, Physical Activity and Health: Toward an Evidence-Informed Conceptual Model. Sports Med, 49(3), 371-383. doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01063-3

Caldwell, H. A. T., Di Cristofaro, N. A., Cairney, J., Bray, S. R., MacDonald, M. J., & Timmons, B. W. (2020). Physical Literacy, Physical Activity, and Health Indicators in School-Age Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(15). doi:10.3390/ijerph17155367

Choi, S. M., Sum, R. K. W., Leung, E. F. L., & Ng, R. S. K. (2018). Relationship between perceived physical literacy and physical activity levels among Hong Kong adolescents. PLoS One, 13(8), e0203105. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203105

Delfa-De-La-Morena, J. M., Bores-Garcia, D., Solera-Alfonso, A., & Romero-Parra, N. (2022). Barriers to Physical Activity in Spanish Children and Adolescents: Sex and Educational Stage Differences. Front Psychol, 13, 910930. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910930

Domínguez-Martín, G., Tárraga-López, P. J., & López-Gil, J. F. (2024a). Exploring the link between perceived physical literacy and academic performance outcomes: insights from the EHDLA study. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6. doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1352114

Domínguez-Martín, G., Tárraga-López, P. J., & López-Gil, J. F. (2024b). Relationship between perceived physical literacy and obesity-related outcomes in adolescents: the EHDLA study. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1321361

Godard, M. C., Rodríguez, N. M. P., Díaz, N., Lera, M. L., Salazar, R. G., & Burrows, A. R. (2008). [Value of a clinical test for assessing physical activity in children]. Rev Med Chil, 136(9), 1155-1162.

Gu, X., Zhang, T., Lun Chu, T., Zhang, X., & Thomas Thomas, K. (2019). Do Physically Literate Adolescents Have Better Academic Performance? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126(4), 585-602. doi:10.1177/0031512519845274

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall

Jean de Dieu, H., & Zhou, K. (2021). Physical Literacy Assessment Tools: A Systematic Literature Review for Why, What, Who, and How. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(15). doi:10.3390/ijerph18157954

Kremers, S. P. J., Dijkman, M. A. M., de Meij, J. S. B., Jurg, M. E., & Brug, J. (2008). Awareness and habit: important factors in physical activity in children. Health Education, 108(6), 475-488. doi:10.1108/09654280810910881

León-Pedroza, J. I., González-Tapia, L. A., del Olmo-Gil, E., Castellanos-Rodríguez, D., Escobedo, G., & González-Chávez, A. (2015). Inflamación sistémica de grado bajo y su relación con el desarrollo de enfermedades metabólicas: de la evidencia molecular a la aplicación clínica. Cirugía y Cirujanos, 83(6), 543-551. doi:10.1016/j.circir.2015.05.041

Li, M. H., Kaioglou, V., Ma, R. S., Choi, S. M., Venetsanou, F., & Sum, R. K. W. (2022). Exploring physical literacy in children aged 8 to 12 years old: a cross-cultural comparison between China and Greece. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2102. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14507-9

Lloret-Segura, Susana, Ferreres-Traver, Adoración, Hernández-Baeza, Ana, & Tomás-Marco, Inés. (2014). El Análisis Factorial Exploratorio de los Ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361

Lopez-Gil, J. F., Martinez-Vizcaino, V., Tarraga-Lopez, P. J., & Garcia-Hermoso, A. (2023). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Spanish perceived physical literacy instrument for adolescents (S-PPLI). J Exerc Sci Fit, 21(3), 246-252. doi:10.1016/j.jesf.2023.03.002

Lu, C., Stolk, R. P., Sauer, P. J., Sijtsma, A., Wiersma, R., Huang, G., & Corpeleijn, E. (2017). Factors of physical activity among Chinese children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 14(1), 36. doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0486-y

Mariana Lira, Teresa Jaña, & Eduardo Candia. (2022). Informe mapa nutricional 2021, Chile.

Oviedo, G. (2004). La definición del concepto de percepción en psicología con base en la Teoría Gestalt. Revista de Estudio Sociales, 18. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-885X2004000200010

Ortiz-Gutiérrez, S., & Cruz-Avelar, A. (2018). Proceso de traducción y adaptación cultural de instrumentos de medición en salud. Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 109(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2017.09.012

Pedrosa, I., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & García-Cueto, E. (2014). Evidencias sobre la Validez de Contenido: Avances Teóricos y Métodos para su Estimación [Content Validity Evidences: Theoretical Advances and Estimation Methods]. Acción Psicológica, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11820

Portela-Pino, I., Lopez-Castedo, A., Martinez-Patino, M. J., Valverde-Esteve, T., & Dominguez-Alonso, J. (2019). Gender Differences in Motivation and Barriers for The Practice of Physical Exercise in Adolescence. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(1). doi:10.3390/ijerph17010168

Rajkovic Vuletic, P., Gilic, B., Zenic, N., Pavlinovic, V., Kesic, M. G., Idrizovic, K., . . . Sekulic, D. (2024). Analyzing the Associations between Facets of Physical Literacy, Physical Fitness, and Physical Activity Levels: Gender- and Age-Specific Cross-Sectional Study in Preadolescent Children. Education Sciences, 14(4). doi:10.3390/educsci14040391

Ramada-Rodilla, J. M., Serra-Pujadas, C., & Delclós-Clanchet, G. L. (2013). Adaptación cultural y validación de cuestionarios de salud: Revisióny recomendaciones metodológicas (1). 55(1), Article 1

Rosselli, M., Ermini, E., Tosi, B., Boddi, M., Stefani, L., Toncelli, L., & Modesti, P. A. (2020). Gender differences in barriers to physical activity among adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 30(9), 1582-1589. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2020.05.005

Schilling-Lara, C., Sánchez-Quiroz, A., Quintana-Moya, L., Rojas-Román, M., Villanueva-Carrasco, E., Sepúlveda-Cofré, A., Valenzuela-Muñoz, M., Morales-Palma, C., & Castillo-Retamal, F. (2023). Cambios en el currículum de la Educación Física chilena: Voces desde el territorio. Ciencias de la actividad física, 24(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29035/rcaf.24.2.1

Sum, R. K., Ha, A. S., Cheng, C. F., Chung, P. K., Yiu, K. T., Kuo, C. C., . . . Wang, F. J. (2016). Construction and Validation of a Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument for Physical Education Teachers. PLoS One, 11(5), e0155610. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155610

Sum, R. K. W., Cheng, C. F., Wallhead, T., Kuo, C. C., Wang, F. J., & Choi, S. M. (2018). Perceived physical literacy instrument for adolescents: A further validation of PPLI. J Exerc Sci Fit, 16(1), 26-31. doi:10.1016/j.jesf.2018.03.002

The jamovi project (2022). jamovi. (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.

Telford, R. M., Telford, R. D., Olive, L. S., Cochrane, T., & Davey, R. (2016). Why Are Girls Less Physically Active than Boys? Findings from the LOOK Longitudinal Study. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150041. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150041

Urbano-Mairena, J., Mendoza-Munoz, M., Carlos-Vivas, J., Pastor-Cisneros, R., Castillo-Paredes, A., Rodal, M., & Munoz-Bermejo, L. (2024). Role of Satisfaction with Life, Sex and Body Mass Index in Physical Literacy of Spanish Children. Children (Basel), 11(2). doi:10.3390/children11020181

Voskuil, V. R., & Robbins, L. B. (2015). Youth physical activity self-efficacy: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs, 71(9), 2002-2019. doi:10.1111/jan.12658

Whitehead M. (2013). Definition of physical literacy and clarification of related. ICSSPE Bull J Sport Sci Phys Educ, 65, 28–33.

Published

2025-02-17

How to Cite

Inostroza-Mondaca, M., Ramírez-Campillo, R., García-Hermoso, A., Pardo Tamayo, C., & Muñoz-Hinrichsen, F. (2025). Validation of the Chilean perceived physical literacy instrument (Ch-PPLI) questionnaire in Chilean girls, boys and adolescents between 10 and 18 years old. Retos, 65, 875–883. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v65.110545

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>