Velocity of the Five Sit-to-Stand Test in Older Adults: A Systematic Review (Velocidad de la prueba sentado-de pie de cinco repeticiones en adultos mayores: Una revisión sistemática)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v45i0.92502Keywords:
aged, Geriatrics, Physical Functional Performance, Muscle Strength, Mobility Limitation, (Adulto mayor; Geriatría; Desempeño Físico Funcional; Fuerza Muscular; Limitación de Movilidad)Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the reference values of the velocity of execution of the five Sit-to-Stand in older adults through a systematic review of the literature. Three databases were reviewed: Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science, with the deadline of March 2021. The search terms were: "sit to stand" OR "stand to sit" OR "chair rise" OR "chair rising" AND "kinematic" OR "velocity". The experimental studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) scale by independent reviewers. A total of seven studies were included. The velocity of execution in older adults (n=85) that presented neurological health conditions was between 0.33 m/s and 0.38 m/s. In the healthy (n=246) ones it was between 0.27 m/s and 0.94 m/s. Between 60 to 70 years (n=157) it was from 0.31 m/s and 1.59 m/s, and from 70 to 80 years (n=225) it was from 0.27 m/s and 1.04 m/s. The execution velocity of five Sit-to-Stand in older adults ranges from a minimum of 0.27 m/s to a maximum of 1.59 m/s for the complete stop-and-sit cycle. These antecedents may be useful to predict or detect functional alterations and disability.
Resumen.El propósito de este estudio fue determinar los valores de referencia de la prueba sentado-de pie de cinco repeticiones en adultos mayores a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Se revisaron tres bases de datos: Medline (PubMed), Scopus y Web of Science con fecha límite Marzo del 2021. Los términos de búsqueda fueron: "sit to stand" OR "stand to sit" OR "chair rise" OR "chair rising" AND "kinematic" OR "velocity". Los estudios experimentales se evaluaron por revisores independientes mediante la escala “Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS)”. Se incluyó un total de siete estudios. La velocidad de ejecución en adultos mayores que presentaban condiciones de salud neurológica (n=85) estuvo entre 0.33 m/s y 0.38 m/s. En sujetos sanos (n=246) estuvo entre 0.27 m/s y 0.94 m/s. En sujetos entre 60 a 70 años (n=157) fue de 0.31 m/s y 1.59 m/s, y de 70 a 80 años (n=225) fue de 0.27 m/s y 1.04 m/s. La velocidad de ejecución de la prueba sentado-de pie de cinco repeticiones en adultos mayores varía desde un mínimo de 0.27 m/s hasta un máximo de 1.59 m/s para el ciclo completo de parar y sentarse. Estos antecedentes pueden ser útiles para predecir o detectar alteraciones funcionales y discapacidad.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Daniel Jerez-Mayorga, Claudia Miranda-Fuentes, Julieta Pérez-Doncel, Bárbara Rool-Maureira, Francisca Saavedra-Rincón, Rocío Zambra-Álvarez, Leonardo Intelangelo, Francisco Guede-Rojas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.