Physical based activities for contextual literacy student elementray school

Authors

  • Imron Imron Teacher of Senior High School Lasem Rembang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0446-2096
  • Suwito Eko Pramono Semarang State University
  • Ani Rusilowati Semarang State University
  • Sulhadi Sulhadi Semarang State University
  • Achmad Samsudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v66.109302

Keywords:

contextual approach, numeracy skills, physical based activities, students elementary school

Abstract

Introduction: The low quality of learning due to educational inequality in Indonesia contributes to Indonesian students' low literacy skills, as evidenced by the results of the PISA and the Education Report Card from the National Assessment. Literacy learning has yet to be obtained by all students, especially at the basic education level.

Objective: The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the cognitive improvement literacy learning, (2) to determine the activeness of students following literacy learning, and (3) to determine the effect of increasing students competence on learning through the motivation of participants following literacy learning with a contextual approach.

Methodology: This study used a mixed-methods approach and was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results: The finding in this study is that the potential of outdoor activities in the school yard to enhance contextual literacy learning for students was explored. The following are the results of the analysis in this research: 1) Physical based activities can be used to enhance contextual literacy learning for elementray student by providing real-life context for mathematical problem solving; 2) Designing problem-solving activities in the school yard experiences has been shown to improve students’ understanding of mathematical literacy concepts and their ability to create appropriate and motivating contexts for problem-solving.

Conclusions: This research contributes to the importance of literacy learning for primary education students with outside the classroom to apply basic, simple, reasoning, and contextual approaches.

References

Agnello, E. C. (2021). Simplified But not the Same: Tracing Numeracy Events Through Manually Simplified Newsela Articles. Numeracy, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1375

Bellini, D., Crescentini, A., Zanolla, G., Cubico, S., Favretto, G., Faccincani, L., Ardolino, P., & Gianesini, G. (2019). Mathematical Competence Scale (MCS) for primary school: The psychometric properties and the validation of an instrument to enhance the sustainability of talents development through the numeracy skills assessment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092569

Boyes, M., & Zink, R. (2005). Education Outdoors in New Zealand Schools : Research Report to the NZ Ministry of Education. May.

Bullynck, M. (2008). The transmission of numeracy: Integrating reckoning in Protestant North-German elementary education (1770-1810). Paedagogica Historica, 44(5), 563–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230802042714

Cheung, S. K., Dulay, K. M., Yang, X., Mohseni, F., & McBride, C. (2021). Home Literacy and Numeracy Environments in Asia. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 12). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578764

de Wit, M., Swartz-Filies, S., van der Walt, J., Clarke, C., Worship, L., Smit, C., van Greunen, D., & Plastow, N. (2023). School readiness in South Africa: Concept analysis and plain language summary. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1396

Glover, J., Samir, N., Kaplun, C., Rimes, T., Edwards, K., Schmied, V., Katz, I., Walsh, P., Lingam, R., & Woolfenden, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of Place based Interventions in Improving Development, Health and Eellbeing Outcomes in Vhildren Aged 0–6 Years Living in Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods in High Income Countries – A Systematic Review. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2021.100064

Gümüş, M. M., & Kukul, V. (2023). Developing a Digital Competence Scale for Teachers: Validity and Reliability Study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2747–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11213-2

Kärki, T., Keinänen, H., Tuominen, A., Hoikkala, M., Matikainen, E., & Maijala, H. (2018). Meaningful learning with mobile devices: pre-service class teachers’ experiences of mobile learning in the outdoors. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1430061

Karlen, Y., Hirt, C. N., Jud, J., Rosenthal, A., & Eberli, T. D. (2023). Teachers as Learners and Agents of Self-Regulated Learning: The Importance of Different Teachers Competence Aspects for Promoting Metacognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104055

Kim, K. T. (2020). The Mediating Role of Core Competencies in the Relationship between Digital Literacy and Perceived Employability among Korean College Students: Difference by Employment Support Program Participation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2520–2535. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080636

Magno, F., Cassia, F., & Ringle, C. M. (2024). A brief review of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) use in quality management studies. TQM Journal, 36(5), 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0197

Napoli, A. R., & Purpura, D. J. (2018). The home literacy and numeracy environment in preschool: Cross-domain relations of parent–child practices and child outcomes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.002

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en

Pérez Brunicardi, D., Archilla-Prat, M. T., Benito-Hernando, L., Martín-del Barrio, M., & Velasco-González, V. (2022). Classrooms outside the school. Lessons for teachers from three educational experiences during exceptional times. Retos, 45, 628–641. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v45i0.91587

Prastiwi, D., Sugiman, & Listyani, E. (2019). The Effectiveness of Contextual Learning in the Cooperative Learning of Think Pair Share Based on Mathematics Concept Understanding of the 7th Grade Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012095

Robertson, J. (2020). 25 Outdoor Maths Games and Activities for All Ages. In Maths Week Scotland 2020 (pp. 3–10). www.creativestarlearning.co.uk.

Velani, F. Y., & Retnawati, H. (2020). Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning Approaches in Improving Mathematics Interest and Learning Achievement of Elementary School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012032

Via, Y., Tatag, S., & Abadi, A. (2021). The Effect of Mathematics Self-Efficacy on Numeracy Skills of Prospective Elementary School Teachers. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(6), 3394–3406. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i6.6590

Yulianti, E., Rahman, N. F. A., Rahmadani, A., Phang, F. A., & Suwono, H. (2024). Exploring Students’ Creativity Using STEAM-Based Reading Texts. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 44(1), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.1.181187

Ziegler, A. S., & Algra, M. H. (2020). Coaching Approaches in Early Intervention and Paediatric Rehabilitation. In Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology (Vol. 62, Issue 5, pp. 569–574). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14493

Downloads

Published

07-04-2025

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

Imron, I., Eko Pramono, S., Rusilowati, A., Sulhadi, S., & Samsudin, A. (2025). Physical based activities for contextual literacy student elementray school. Retos, 66, 263-273. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v66.109302