Pragmatic competence and nonverbal communication in young people with intellectual disability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v75.111660Keywords:
Body expression, intellectual disability, nonverbal communication, pragmaticAbstract
Introduction: human communication is the process where two or more people engage in the exchange of information. Pragmatic competence is one of the necessary components to make that communication effective. People with intellectual disability may have difficulty negotiating pragmatics and verbal language in the social domain, a connection often overlooked by the scientific community.
Objective: this study, conducted in a special education center, aims to assess the communication processes of people with intellectual disability by focusing on the relationship between pragmatic competence and nonverbal communication.
Methodology: different tools were used to evaluate the nonverbal component of communication: intellectual quotient, the pragmatic use of language, verbal expression and motor expression.
Results: strong correlations were found between some of the evaluated areas. However, no differences were observed in the intelligence test results. Although no significant differences were detected, both verbal expression and motor expression outcomes were slightly higher among students who scored better on nonverbal communication observation tests. The total pragmatic competence results and standard scores on the K-BIT were similar between the two groups.
Conclusions: pragmatics is especially important for adolescents with intellectual disabilities and physical expression may be a crucial means to develop these competences.
References
Acosta, V. & Moreno, A. (2005). Dificultades del lenguaje en ambientes educativos. Masson.
Alba, C. (2018). Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje un modelo didáctico para proporcionar oportuni-dades de aprender a todos los estudiantes. Padres y Maestros / Journal of Parents and Teachers, (374), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.14422/pym.i374.y2018.003
American Psychiatric Association (2014). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
Arechavaleta Viñuales, M. (2019). Habilidades sociales en la discapacidad intelectual. Educación y futu-ro digital, (19), 95-118.
Baixauli, I., Berenguer, C., Roselló, B. & Colomer, C. (2018). Análisis de habilidades pragmáticas de niños con TEA y niños con TEA y TDAH. European Journal of Child Development, Education and Psy-chopathology, 6(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejpad.v6i1.60
Bishop, D. (2013). Children’s Communication Checklist (CCC-2). En F.R. Volkmar (Eds). Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders (pp. 614–618). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_1929
Camargo Fernández, L. C. & Cortés García, R. C. (2020). Desarrollo y mejora de la competencia pragmá-tica en niños y adolescentes con trastorno del espectro autista y lenguaje funcional, Revista de estudios lingüísticos hispanos, 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.7203/normas.v10i1.19279
Crespo-Eguílaz, N., Magallón, S., Sánchez-Carpintero, R., & Narbona, J. (2016). La adaptación al caste-llano de la Children’s Communication Checklist permite detectar las dificultades en el uso pragmático del lenguaje y diferenciar subtipos clínicos. Rev Neurol, 62(Supl 1), 49-57.
Diken, Ö. (2019). Describing and comparing pragmatic language skills of Turkish students with typical development and inclusive education students with mild intellectual disability. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(2), 157-166
Echavarría-Ramírez L. & Tirapu-Ustárroz J. (2021). Exploración neuropsicológica en niños con disca-pacidad intelectual. Rev Neurol, 73, 66-76. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7302.2021025.
Echeita, G. (2017). Educación inclusiva. Sonrisas y lágrimas. Aula abierta, 46(2), 17-24
Emerson, E. & Baines, S. (2011). Health inequalities and people with learning disabilities in the UK. Tiz-ard Learning Disability Review, 16, 42-48.
García, J. C., Díez, E., Wojcik, D. Z. & Santamaría, M. (2020). Communication support needs in adults with intellectual disabilities and its relation to quality of life. International Journal of Environ-mental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207370
Garzón, I., Gerolin, M., Herrero, M. J., Mena, M., Canto, A. & Vidorreta, I. (2020). Abordaje de las dificulta-des de comunicación en personas con discapacidad intelectual: la importancia del contexto. Re-vista Española de Discapacidad, 8(I), 103-127.
Guiraud, P. (1972). La semiología. Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
Griffiths, C. & Smith, M. (2016), Attuning: A Communication Process between People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disability and Their Interaction Partners. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil, 29, 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12162
Gutiérrez, P. & Martorell, A. (2011). Las personas con discapacidad intelectual ante las TIC. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 18(36), 173-180.
Hatton, C. (1998). Pragmatic language skills in people with intellectual disabilities: a review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 23, 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668259800033601
Hernández Hernández, S., Marín Quinto, S., Guillén Martín, V. M. & Mumbardó-Adam, C. (2025). As-sessing Pragmatic Skills in People with Intellectual Disabilities. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030281
Hofmann, V. & Müller, C. M. (2022). Challenging behaviour in students with intellectual disabilities: The role of individual and classmates’ communication skills. Journal of Intellectual Disability Re-search, 66(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12922
Kaufman, A.S. & Kaufman, N.L. (2000). Test breve de inteligencia de Kaufman. TEA Ediciones.
Kirk, S., McCarthy, J. & Kirk, W. (2009). Test de Illinois de Aptitudes Psicolingüísticas (7a ed.) TEA Edi-ciones.
Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. BOE núm. 340, 30-12-2020, pp. 122868–122953. Jefatura del Estado. Ref. BOE-A-2020-17264
López-Riobóo, E. & Martínez-Castilla, P. (2024). Prosodic skills in Spanish-speaking adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome. Int J Lang Commun Disord., 59(4), 1284-1295. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13001
Matthews, D., Biney, H. & Abbot-Smith, K. (2018). Individual Differences in Children’s Pragmatic Abil-ity: A Review of Associations with Formal Language, Social Cognition, and Executive Func-tions. Language Learning and Development, 14(3), 186–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2018.1455584
Memisevic, H. & Hadzic, S. (2013). Speech and language disorders in children with intellectual disability in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 24, 92-99. https://doi.org/10.5463/DCID.v24i2.214
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Routledge.
Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (2022). Enseñanzas no universitarias. Alumnado con necesidad específica de apoyo educativo. Curso 2020-2021. https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano/estadisticas/no-universitaria/alumnado/apoyo/2020-2021.html
Monfort, M. (2004). Intervención en niños con trastornos pragmáticos del lenguaje y la comunicación. Revista de Neurología, 38(supl 1), S85-S87
Moraleda Sepulveda, E., Pulido García, N., Simón Medina, N. & Santos Muriel, N. (2025). Vocabulario comprensivo y habilidades pragmáticas en síndrome de Down: ¿son dependientes?. Areté, 25(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.33881/1657-2513.art.25106
Moreno, J. M. & Rabazo, M. J. R. (2017). Intervención psicopedagógica en niños Maltratados: Estimula-ción del lenguaje. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Psicoeducativa y Psicopedagógica, 4(8), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v4i8.1223
Mulatova, N. A. (2016). Inclusive education of children with intellectual disabilities. International Jour-nal of Experimental Education, 4, 259-261.
Nascimento, D. (2005). Comunicación no verbal: algunas diferencias gestuales entre España y Brasil. Linred: Lingüística en la red, 2, 1-14, https://ebuah.uah.es/xmlui/handle/10017/24643.
Orden 2808/2023, de 30 de julio, de la Consejería de Educación, Ciencia y Universidades, por la que se regula la escolarización y la atención educativa a las diferencias individuales del alumnado en centros de educación especial y unidades de educación especial en centros ordinarios, así como la escolarización combinada en la Comunidad de Madrid. Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid (BOCM), número 194, de 10 de agosto de 2023.
Plena Inclusión (2015). Guía informativa para familiares de alumnos y alumnas con necesidades educa-tivas especiales.
Rodríguez Barquero, V. (2008). El mejoramiento de la salud a través de la expresión corporal: un enfo-que holístico. Reflexiones, 87(1), 127-137.
Rodríguez Gregory, A. & Tortosa, J. (2016). Nivel de condición física y calidad de vida en personas con discapacidad intelectual. Actividad Física y Deporte: Ciencia y Profesión, 24, 13-28
Rodriguez Muñoz, F. J. (2013). Pilot assessment of nonverbal pragmatic ability in people with Asperger syndrome. Psychology of Language and Communication, 17(3), 279–294.
Roso-Bas, F., Pades-Jiménez, A. & Ferrer-Pérez, V. A. (2017). Competencia comunicativa: Validación de una escala para evaluar la comunicación no verbal durante el discurso Communicative Compe-tence: Validation of a Scale to Assess Nonverbal Communication during the Speech. Estudios Sobre Educación, 32, 95–113. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.32.95-113
Sanabria Navarro, J. R., Pérez, Y. S., Pereira, L. G., Ballesteros Saltos, F. G., Barrios Palacio, Y. D. & Vilchez Pirela, R. (2021). Metamorfosis educativa de la actividad física para personas con síndrome de Down (Educational metamorphosis of physical activity for people with Down syndrome). Retos, 41, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i41.83315
Shilc, M., Shmidt, M. & Koshir, S. (2017). Pragmatic abilities of pupils with mild intellectual disabili-ties. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 18(1-2), 55-73.
Smith, M., Manduchi, B., Burke, É., Carroll, R., McCallion, P. & McCarron, M. (2020). Communication dif-ficulties in adults with Intellectual Disability: results from a national cross-sectional study. Re-search in Developmental Disabilities, 97, 103557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103557.
Torre Ramos, E. (2002). La comunicación educativa. Retos, 3, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i3.35099
Touriñán, J. M. (1996). Análisis conceptual de los procesos educativos:" formales"," no formales" e" informales". Teoría educativa, (8) 55-80
Van Den Heuvel, E., Manders, E., Swillen, A. & Zink, I. (2018). Atypical language characteristics and tra-jectories in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Journal of Communication Disorders, 75, 37-56.
Vanegas, J. H. & Marín Mejía, F. (2010). Comunicación gestual y discapacidad. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud, 15(2), 158-172
Volden, J., Coolican, J., Garon, N., White, J. & Bryson, S. (2009). Brief report: Pragmatic language in au-tism spectrum disorder: Relationships to measures of ability and disability. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 39(2), 388-393.
Zashchirinskaia, O. V. (2020). Study of the Understanding of Gestural Communication in Children with Intellectual Disabilities in the Dynamics of Psychological Impact. Journal of Intellectual Disabil-ity-Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(4), 619-632.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Teresa García Pastor, Bruno García Tardón, Diana Ruiz Vicente, Joanne Mampaso Desbrow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.