Physiological arousal effects on pain perception in elite male and female endurance and strength athletes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v81.117671Keywords:
Arousal, cold pressor task, endurance athletes, pain perception, strength athletesAbstract
Introduction: Sports performance depends on pain, arising from three elements: physiology, cognition, and emotion. Arousal significantly affects pain perception in competition, as athletes must regulate physical exertion and emotional stress.
Objective: The present study aims to determine the effect of physiological arousal on pain perception in elite male and female endurance and strength athletes.
Methodology: A quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to evaluate 63 participants categorized as endurance athletes, strength athletes, or non-athletes. The measurement of pain included the Cold Pressor Task, which had participants experience durability testing through virtual reality boxing simulations that replicated competitive conditions. The researchers examined heart rate to measure physiological arousal.
Results: Pain threshold and tolerance measured through Analysis of Covariance showed important distinctions between groups (p = 0.001 for both variables), (F= 78.67; 117.51), respectively. Non-athletes' scores grew after arousal, but endurance and strength athletes showed declines in these measurements after the intervention. Gender did not influence the results measured for pain perception during the study.
Discussion: Present study indicates that arousal produces unique effects on pain sensitivity based on whether participants belong to athletic or non-athletic groups because their bodies have different ways of responding to stress and the physiology of endogenous opioids together with mental conditioning mechanics.
Conclusions: No significant differences in pain perception were observed between the two athlete groups. Non-athletes exhibited significant improvements in pain threshold and tolerance, aligning with previous research findings.
References
Addison, T., Kremer, J., & Bell, R. (1998). Understanding the psychology of pain in sport. Irish Journal of Psychology, 19(4), 486–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.1998.10558209
Apriady, H., Fitri, M., &Rahely, B. (2025). Peer support for female athletes in a psychological review of elite futsal sports. Retos, 73, 535-546. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v73.117389
Assa T, Geva N, Zarkh Y, Defrin R. (2019). The type of sport matters: Pain perception of endurance athletes versus strength athletes. Eur J Pain. 23(4), 686-696. Doi: 10.1002/ejp.1335. Epub 2018 Nov 18. PMID: 30379385
Bandura, A. (1988). Self-Efficacy Conception of Anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1, 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615808808248222
Banozic, A., Miljkovic, A., Bras, M., Puljak, L., Kolcic, I., Hayward, C., & Polasek, O. (2018). Neuroticism and pain catastrophizing aggravate response to pain in healthy adults: An experimental study. Korean Journal of Pain, 31(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.1.16
Dewangga, M. W., Candrika, A. A., Medistianto, T. N. R., & Wilger, R. V. (2025). Cold-water immersion for reducing IL-6 and CK in female footballers [Inmersión en agua fría para reducir IL-6 y CK en futbolistas]. Retos, 70, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v70.110245
Goodin, B., Bulls, H., Freeman, E., Robbins, M., Anderson, A., & Ness, T. (2015). Sex differences in experimental measures of pain sensitivity and endogenous pain inhibition. Journal of Pain Research, 311. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s84607
Kaur Chawla, J., Bala, I., Dhiman, C., Vishal Dixit, P., Paliwal, V., Bhattacharjee, B., & Kaushik Sharma, S. (2025). Psychological analysis of anxiety and its impact on athletic performance in competitive sports. Retos, 72, 1174-1185. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v71.117070
Kuppens, K., Feijen, S., Roussel, N., Nijs, J., Cras, P., van Wilgen, P., & Struyf, F. (2019). Training volume is associated with pain sensitivity, but not with endogenous pain modulation, in competitive swimmers. Physical Therapy in Sport, 37, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.04.001
Kyle, B. N., & Mcneil, D. W. (2014). Autonomic arousal and experimentally induced pain: a critical review of the literature. Pain Res Manag, 19(3), 159-67. doi: 10.1155/2014/536859. Epub 2014 Feb 14. PMID: 24533429; PMCID: PMC4158962
Lee, I. S., Necka, E. A., & Atlas, L. Y. (2020). Distinguishing pain from nociception, salience, and arousal: How autonomic nervous system activity can improve neuroimaging tests of specificity. NeuroImage, 01; 204, 116254. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116254
López-Roel, S., García-Ordóñez, E., & Isorna Folgar, M. (2025). Necesidades psicológicas básicas en deportistas de alto nivel según género y edad [Basic psychological needs in high-level athletes according to gender and age]. Retos, 71, 135-149. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v71.108264
Melchior, M., Poisbeau, P., Gaumond, I., & Marchand, S. (2016). Insights into the mechanisms and the emergence of sex-differences in pain. Neuroscience, 3(338), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.007
Mogil, J. S. (2012). Sex differences in pain and pain inhibition: Multiple explanations of a controversial phenomenon. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(12), 859-66. 10.1038/nrn3360
Pawlak, M. (2013). Aspects of pain in sport. Trends in sport sciences, 3(20), 123-134.
Pen LJ, Fisher CA. (1994). Athletes and pain tolerance. Sports Med, 18(5), 319-29. 10.2165/00007256-199418050-00004. PMID: 7871293
Perkins, D., Wilson, G. V., & Kerr, J. H. (2001). The Effects of Elevated Arousal and Mood on Maximal Strength Performance in Athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/104132001753144392
Pettersen, S. D., Aslaksen, P. M., & Pettersen, S. A. (2020). Pain Processing in Elite and High-Level Athletes Compared to Non-athletes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01908
Piovesan, A., Mirams, L., Poole, H., Moore, D., & Ogden, R. (2019). The Relationship Between Pain-Induced Autonomic Arousal and Perceived Duration. Emotion, 19(7), 1148–1161. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000512
Robinson, M. E., Gagnon, C. M., Riley, J. L., & Price, D. D. (2003). Altering gender role expectations: Effects on pain tolerance, pain threshold, and pain ratings. Journal of Pain, 4(5), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00559-5
Salwin E, Zając A. (2016). Pain tolerance in sport. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 8(3), 71-80. 10.29359/BJHPA.08.3.08
Saquib, Juliann, AlMohaimeed, Haneen A., AlOlayan, Sally A., AlRebdi, Nora A., AlBulaihi, Jana I., AlMugbel, Renad A., AlDughaishm, Yusra M., AlBahli, Hind K. and Saquib, Nazmus. (2021). Effect of interactive vs. passive virtual reality on pain threshold and tolerance. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 22 (1), 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2021-0046
Tesarz, J., Schuster, A. K., Hartmann, M., Gerhardt, A., & Eich, W. (2012). Pain perception in athletes compared to normally active controls: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain, 153(6), 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.005
Tse MM, Ng JK, Chung JW, Wong TK. (2002). The effect of visual stimuli on pain threshold and tolerance. J Clin Nurs. 11(4), 462-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00608. x. PMID: 12100642
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aneseh Firouz, Raed Abdulameer Abbas Al-Mashhadi, Elham Azimzadeh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.