Acoustic analysis of vocal intensity and decision-making processes in national level soft tennis officiating: A mixed methods study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v78.118493Keywords:
Game management, mixed methods, soft tennis, sports officiating, vocal intensityAbstract
Introduction: The International Soft Tennis Federation mandates a "loud and clear" call for officiating; however, this requirement remains qualitatively abstract without empirical acoustic metrics.
Objective: This study aimed to quantify the vocal intensity of the "out" call among national-level referees and elucidate the cognitive rationale underlying their vocal modulations.
Methodology: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN → qual) was employed. Fifteen national-level referees (n = 15) participated in a controlled field simulation on a regulation Soft Tennis court to maintain ecological validity. Vocal intensity (dBA) was measured using a Class 2 sound level meter under three conditions: Appropriate (Baseline), Low, and High intensity. Subsequently, stimulated recall interviews were conducted with a subsample (n = 6) to explore decision-making processes.
Results: Quantitative analysis revealed a significant hierarchy in vocal output, F (2, 28) = 53.891, p < .001, ( = .794), High-intensity calls yielded the highest mean (103.83 ± 5.54 dB), while low-intensity calls (93.69 ± 3.39 dB) were significantly lower than the baseline (98.33 ± 4.23 dB).
Discussion: The findings suggest that vocal intensity is not a static physical requirement but a dynamic strategic instrument. High intensity serves as a "psychological wall" for conflict management during close calls, whereas low intensity reflects "social etiquette" and empathy during obvious errors.
Conclusions: Referees modulate their voice based on situational demands. These findings transition officiating standards from abstract mandates to measurable acoustic benchmarks, advocating for the integration of vocal competency into referee certification programs.
References
Al Ardha, M. A., Putra, K. P., Sahertian, J., Wijaya, A., Bikalawan, S. S., Simanjuntak, F. Y., Ramdhanu, I. K.,
& Yang, C. B. (2025). Video-based AI system for automatic range of motion assessment in physical education and sport. Retos, 74, 221–235. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v74.117535
Batista, M., & Šimenko, J. (2026). Multidimensional determinants of decision making in judo: A
systematic review. Retos, 75, 369–381. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v75.117290
Bosselut, G., Boiché, J., Salamé, B., Fouquereau, E., Guilbert, L., & Serrano, O. C. (2018). Transformational
leadership and group cohesion in sport: Examining the mediating role of interactional justice
using a within- and between-team approach. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 13(6), 912–928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954118801156
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Cunningham, I., Kittel, A., Mascarenhas, D., MacMahon, C., & Larkin, P. (2025). Decision making for sports
officials: Training and assessment perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032615943
Cunningham, I., Simmons, P., & Mascarenhas, D. (2018). Sport officials' strategies for managing
interactions with players: Face-work on the front-stage. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 39, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.009
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis
program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Furley, P., & Schweizer, G. (2016). Nonverbal communication of confidence in soccer referees: An
experimental test of Darwin’s leakage hypothesis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(6), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0192
Hidayatullah, F., Setyawati, H., Kusuma, D. W. Y., Sulaiman, S., Hidayah, T., & Wahyudi, A. (2026).
Enhancing basketball perimeter shoot through verbal augmented and terminal feedback based on personality type. Retos, 75, 729–738. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v75.117830
International Soft Tennis Federation. (2025). Technical rules.
https://softtennis-istf.com/technical-rules/
Karaçam, A., Orhan, B. E., Özdemir, A. S., Sabuncu, A. A., & Mereută, C. (2023). Examination of the
relationship between basketball referee's mental well-being and emotional regulation levels. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e16768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16768
Kittel, A., Lindsay, R., Larkin, P., Spittle, M., & Cunningham, I. (2025). The effectiveness of decision-
making training in team-sport officials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 79, Article 102841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102841
Kurniawan, I., Nugroho, S., Rozi, F., Al-Faiz, J., Alvin Zuhair, N., & Eko Prayetno, B. (2025). The influence
of hearing impairment level and gender on learning comprehension in badminton: Differences in understanding badminton learning. Retos, 74, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v74.116165
Lagoudaki, G., Tsitskari, E., Vernadakis, N., & Paschalidou, K. (2026). How do CSR dimensions shape
ethical perceptions and loyalty? Insights from recreational tennis. Retos, 77, 426–437. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v77.118432
Laplace, P., & Butler, R. (2025). A multimodal reflection on the authority of the badminton umpire.
Multimodality & Society, 5(3), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795251355863
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Manescu, D. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence in elite sports training and prospects for integration into
school sports. Retos, 73, 128–141. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v73.117261
McEwan, G. P., Unnithan, V. B., Easton, C., Glover, A. J., & Arthur, R. (2024). Decision-making accuracy of
soccer referees in relation to markers of internal and external load. European Journal of Sport Science, 24(6), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.12096
McKeen, M., & Stevinson, C. (2025). The frequency and determinants of positive and negative officiating
interactions and the relationships with mental ill-health symptoms in sports officials. Sports Medicine, 55, 1527–1542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02216-3
Neville, T. J., & Salmon, P. M. (2016). Never blame the umpire – a review of situation awareness models
and methods for examining the performance of officials in sport. Ergonomics, 59(7), 962–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1100758
Nurfadhila, R., Alim, A., Nugroho, W., & Mohammad, R. (2026). Exploration of the role of technology in
tennis assessment: A literature review. Retos, 75, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v75.117588
Plessner, H., Schweizer, G., Brand, R., & O’Hare, D. (2009). A multiple-cue learning approach as the basis
for understanding and improving soccer referees’ decision making. Progress in Brain Research, 174, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(09)01313-2
Quinaud, R. T., Cruz Martins, L., & Milistetd, M. (2026). The coach competence questionnaire: Measuring
sport coaches’ functional competencies. Retos, 77, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v77.118005
Samuel, R. D., Galily, Y., & Hochman, G. (2025). The “silent” noise: Moving forward from bias to noise in
football referees’ decision-making. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.
Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2025.2453462
Schrödter, R., & Klatt, S. (2024). Context matters: An examination of game management in refereeing.
International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22(7), 1795–1818. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2023.2236788
Subagio, I., Pranoto, A., Tomoliyus, T., Ekawati, F. F., Firdaus, K., Suyoko, A., Firmansyah, A., Dinata, V. C.,
Gusrianto, W. A., & Orhan, B. E. (2026). Comparative analysis of physical and physiological performance in professional tennis, table tennis, and badminton athletes. Retos, 76, 790–797. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v76.118155
Tseng, M. Y., & Chen, H. (2022). Mutual face-maintaining acts: An analysis of talks between NBA referees
and players/coaches. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2022.17802
Wang, H., Zhang, C., Ji, Z., Li, X., & Wang, L. (2024). Faster, more accurate, more confident? An exploratory
experiment on soccer referees’ yellow card decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1415170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415170
Webb, T., Hancock, D. J., Weston, M., Warner, S., Helsen, W. F., MacMahon, C., … Tingle, J. K. (2025). The
future for sport officiating research: An expert statement. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2025.2468711
Yulinar, Y., Ma’mun, A., Yudiana, Y., Nuryadi, N., Kurniawati, A., Razali, R., Amiruddin, A., &
Syahrianursaifi, S. (2026). Correlation analysis of teachers’ teaching skills and student sportsmanship in physical education. Retos, 77, 663–675. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v77.118544
Zanin, A. C., Marr, C., & Avalos, B. L. (2024). Sport officiating as aggression work: A positioning analysis
of gendered emotion management. Management Communication Quarterly, 38(3), 415–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189231200240
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nathapol Thongthanapat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
