Diagnosing kinesthetic intelligence through innovative e-assessment of motion literacy based on laban dance notation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v80.118601Keywords:
Kinesthetic Intelligence, Laban Notation, Motion Literacy, E-Assessment, Dance EducationAbstract
Introduction and Objective. Assessment in dance education must integrate cognitive understanding and motor execution to accurately diagnose kinesthetic intelligence. This study aims to develop an innovative e‑assessment model for motion literacy based on Laban dance notation to objectively diagnose kinesthetic intelligence among junior high school students.
Methodology. This research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach. The model was designed based on a Focus Group Discussion with junior high school arts teachers and validated through the Delphi method involving experts in dance education, information technology, and educational measurement. Field trials were conducted with 79 students from five administrative regions of Jakarta. Data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially to examine motion literacy knowledge, movement skills, and user acceptance.
Results. Knowledge scores ranged from 20 to 100 with a mean of 70, indicating moderate understanding of Laban notation. Movement skill performance varied across participants and was influenced by device limitations. Automated scoring successfully provided immediate feedback. User acceptance analysis revealed high levels of usability and learning engagement, with two dominant factors: usability and learning value.
Conclusions. The Laban notation‑based e‑assessment model is effective and reliable for diagnosing kinesthetic intelligence in school contexts. Despite technological constraints, the model offers an innovative, meaningful, and objective approach to motion literacy assessment in dance education.
References
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete Ed.). Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arstorp, A. T. (2021). 25+ years of ICT in policy documents for teacher education in Norway and Den-mark (1992 to 2020): A study of how digital technology is integrated into policy documents. Education Inquiry, 12(4), 365-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1821730
Arstorp, A. T. (2021). 25+ years of ICT in policy documents for teacher education in Norway and Den-mark (1992 to 2020): A study of how digital technology is integrated into policy documents. Education Inquiry, 12(4), 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1972594
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement. Hu-man-Computer Interaction, 28(1), 40-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2012.712435
Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). Understanding the Role of Body Movement in Player Engagement. Hu-man–Computer Interaction, 28(1), 40–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2012.688468
Biggs, J, & Moore, P. (1993). The process of learning. Prentice Hall.
Bucek, L. E. (1998). Developing dance literacy: Integrating motif writing into theme-based children's dance classes. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(7), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605584
Charteris, J, Quinn, F., Parkes, M, Fletcher, P, & Reyes, V. (2015). e-Assessment for learning (eAfL) in higher education: Is it a wolf in sheep’s clothing?. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (9). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i9.286 Fuentes-Nieto, T., López-Pastor, V. M., & Palacios-Picos, A. (2022). A combination of transformative and authentic assessment through ICT in Physical Education. Retos, 44, 728–735. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v44i0.91459
Çakır, T., M.K., K., Asghar, S., Rajput, A., & M. Ahmed, S. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of gamifica-tion in physical education: enhancing engagement through play and movement . Retos, 64, 925-935. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v64.112788
Cicalò, E. (2020). Multiple intelligences in architectural design. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51961-2
Dania, A, Koutsouba, M, & Tyrovola, V. (2015). The ability of using symbols and its contribution to dance learning: The Laban notation system. Choros International Dance Journal, 4, 37-49.
Dils, A. (2007). Moving into dance: Dance appreciation as dance literacy. In L. Bresler (Ed.), Interna-tional Handbook of Research in Arts Education (pp. 569-580). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3052-9_38
Guest, A. H. (2013). Labanotation: The system of analysing and recording movement. Routledge.
Jasni, S. R, Zailani, S., & Zainal, H. (2018). Gamification approach in learning the Arabic language. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 13(1), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol13no1.189
Lai, E. R. & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: Integrating research findings. Pearson.
Lee, C. I, Chen, I. P, Hsieh, C. M, & Liao, C. N. (2016). Design aspects of scoring systems in a game. Art and Design Review, 5(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2017.51003
Linstone, H. A. & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (2002). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley. https://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/
Lolowang, D. M, Ihsan, F, Piri, N, & Makadada, F. A. (2025). Innovative teaching methods in physical fitness education: integrating technology and gamification to improve student engagement, a systematic review. Retos, 61, (in press). https:// DOI: 10.47197/retos. v68.116064
Luppe, K. S. (2007). The effects of movement on literacy [Doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University].
Lutz, J, Durham, T. W, & Coble, C. R. (1988). Personality characteristics of junior high school students successful with computers. Computers in the Schools, 5(1-2), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v05n01_20
Masluhah, M., & Afifah, K. R. (2022). Electronic portfolio as an instrument for student learning assess-ment in the digital era. Journal Basicedu, 6(2), 1883-1896. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2389 González Valencia, C., Troncoso Ulloa, K., & Gar-cía Miranda, M. (2025). Aprendizaje autónomo y portafolio: percepciones de docentes en for-mación en pedagogía en Educación Física (Autonomous learning and portofolio: perceptions of Trainee Teachers in physical education pedagogy). Retos, 67. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v67.109693
Mottiar, Z., Byrne, G., Gorham, G., & Robinson, E. (2024). An examination of the impact of COVID-19 on assessment practices in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 14(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2114881 Del Valle Díaz, S., Cabanillas Cruz, E. C., Villamil Cabello, E., & de la Vega Marcos, R. (2022). Claves para aprender Educación Física du-rante el confinamiento (Keys to learning Physical Education during confinement). Retos, 43. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v43i0.89263
Mueller, F. F. & Isbister, K. (2014). Movement-based game guidelines. In Proceedings of the CHI Confer-ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2191-2200). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557163
Mueller, F. F. & Isbister, K. (2014). Movement-based game guidelines. In Proceedings of the CHI Confer-ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2191-2200). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557163
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Oladele, O. K. (2024). Kinesthetic learning: Hands-on learning and active engagement. Retrieved from. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385458023
Perkins, D. N, & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed, Vol. 2, pp. 6452-6457). Pergamon Press.
Pusvisasari, L, Alisa, I. N, Rahayu, S, & Hasanah, N. U. (2024). Implementation of technology in educa-tional evaluation. Jurnal Studi Multidisipliner, 8(6).
Redecker, C. & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12018
Roberts, R. D, Stankov, L, Pallier, G, & Dolph, B. (1997). Charting the cognitive sphere: Tactile-kinesthetic performance within the structure of intelligence. Intelligence, 25(2), 111-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90045-6 Hariono, A. H., Aryanto, B., Herwin, H., & Nugroho, A. (2024). La mejora de la condición física y el interés de los alumnos de primaria ha-cia el deporte pencak silat en términos de inteligencia kinestésica (The improvement of physi-cal condition and interest of elementary school students toward pencak silat sport in terms of kinesthetic intelligence). Retos, 56. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v56.103322
Scoular, C, & Teo, I. (2021). Aligning 21st-century skills with curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 1-13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66430-5_1 Hardiansyah, S., Kusmaedi, N., Ma'mun, A., & Mahendra, A. (2024). Actitudes de los profesores de educación física hacia la estimulación de las habilidades de pensamiento de orden superior en los alumnos de primaria (Physical Education Teachers' Attitudes Towards Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills in Elementary School Students). Retos, 54. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v54.103844
Taylor, J. A, & Ivry, R. B. (2012). The role of strategies in motor learning. Annals of the New York Acad-emy of Sciences, 1251(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06430
Tenison, C, Fincham, J. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2016). Phases of learning: How skill acquisition impacts cognitive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 87, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.03.001
Triana, D. D, Adhi, B. P, & Hermawati, S. (2020). Web-based motion literacy assessment in dance learn-ing in a junior high school. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 424, pp. 147-152). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.111
Triana, D. D, Kusumawardani, D, Rahayu, W, & Yudha, R. P. (2020). Laban notation-based motion litera-cy teaching materials to diagnose kinesthetic intelligence in junior high school students through e-learning. KnE Social Sciences, 4(14), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i14.7903
Triana, D. D, Sabarini, S. S, & Yudha, R. P. (2020). Learning and assessment of motion literacy based on the web. https://10.2991/assehr.k.200129.056
Triana, D. D, & Yudha, R. P. (2021). Performance assessment through motion literacy to assess the mo-toric skills of junior high school students based on Laban notation. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v21i1.29132
Triana, D. D, Yudha, R. P, & Adhi, B. P. (2024). Movement literacy educational game based on dance notation to diagnose kinesthetic intelligence of junior high school students. Journal of Scientific, Research, Education, and Technology, 3(1), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v3i1.321
Warburton, E. C. (2000). The dance on paper: The effect of notation-use on learning and development in dance. Research in Dance Education, 1(2), 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647890020011850
Wiggins. G, & McTighe, J. (2007). Schooling by design: Mission, action, and achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development/ ED556130.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dinny Devi Triana, Hery Budiawan, Riyan Arthur, Ilham Lutfi Ramdani, Ruslina Irianty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
