The effectiveness of different types of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v78.118678Keywords:
Frozen shoulder, adhesive capsulitis, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, focused shock wave therapy, radial shock wave therapy, pain management, shoulder function, randomized control trial, systematic reviewAbstract
Introduction: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a condition marked by pain and stiffness, which limits daily activities and quality of life. This review evaluates the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the form of focused (fSWT) and radial (rSWT) modalities for managing FS, aiming to clarify their comparative effectiveness and synthesize current clinical evidence. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed across nine databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2010 and 2024 assessing ESWT in FS. Studies were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data included pain outcomes, shoulder function, and ROM measures.
Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Due to study heterogeneity, findings were summarized narratively.
Evidence Synthesis: Nine RCTs met the criteria: four evaluated fSWT and five evaluated rSWT, with intervention and follow‑up durations ranging from 6 to 24 weeks.
Findings for fSWT were inconsistent, showing early benefits within the first two months but limited improvement in internal rotation. Outcomes were less reliable in individuals with uncontrolled diabetes. In contrast, rSWT consistently improved pain, ROM, and functional measures, with effects lasting up to 24 weeks. rSWT also demonstrated systemic benefits, including improved HbA1c levels in diabetic patients. Both ESWT types were well tolerated, with only minor, transient adverse effects such as mild discomfort or small hematomas.
Conclusion: Radial SWT shows more consistent and sustained improvements in FS management compared to focused SWT, which demonstrates variable results across studies.
References
Balzer, K., Goebell, H., Breuer, N., Rüping, K. W., & Leder, L. D. (1986). Epidemiology of gallstones in a German industrial town (Essen) from 1940–1975. Digestion, 33(4), 189–197.
Chen, C. Y., Hu, C. C., Weng, P. W., Huang, Y. M., Chiang, C. J., Chen, C. H., et al. (2014). Extracorporeal shockwave therapy improves short-term functional outcomes of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 23(12), 1843–1851.
de Morton, N. A. (2009). The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: A demographic study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 55(2), 129–133.
Dias, R., Cutts, S., & Massoud, S. (2005). Frozen shoulder. BMJ, 331(7530), 1453–1456.
El Naggar, T. E. D. M., Maaty, A. I. E., & Mohamed, A. E. (2020). Effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy versus ultrasound-guided low-dose intra-articular steroid injection in im-proving shoulder pain, function, and range of motion in diabetic patients with shoulder adhe-sive capsulitis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 29(7), 1300–1309.
Elerian, A. E., Rodriguez-Sanz, D., Elsherif, A. A., Dorgham, H. A., Al-Hamaky, D. M. A., El Fakharany, M. S., et al. (2021). Effectiveness of shock wave therapy versus intra-articular corticosteroid injec-tion in diabetic frozen shoulder patients’ management: Randomized controlled trial. Applied Sciences, 11(8), 3500.
Farhat, M. A., Butt, M., Saeed, A., Waseem, A., & Shah, S. M. (2021). Effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in long-term functional outcomes of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 11, 67–70.
Foley, N. C., Teasell, R. W., Bhogal, S. K., & Speechley, M. R. (2003). Stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review: Methodology. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10(1), 1–7.
Hussein, A. Z., & Donatelli, R. A. (2016). The efficacy of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy in shoulder adhesive capsulitis: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clin-ical study. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 18(1), 63–76.
Konarski, W., Poboży, T., Hordowicz, M., Poboży, K., & Domańska, J. (2020). Current concepts of natu-ral course and management of frozen shoulder: A clinical overview. Orthopedic Reviews, 12(4), 8832.
Lewis, J. (2015). Frozen shoulder contracture syndrome: Aetiology, diagnosis and management. Manu-al Therapy, 20(1), 2–9.
Muthukrishnan, R., Rashid, A. A., & Al-Alkharji, F. (2019). The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for frozen shoulder in patients with diabetes: randomized control trial. Journal of physical therapy science, 31(7), 493–497.
Nambi, G., Alghadier, M., Eltayeb, M. M., Aldhafian, O. R., Saleh, A. K., Alsanousi, N., et al. (2024). Addi-tional effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy with lidocaine injection on clinical and MRI findings in frozen shoulder: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled tri-al. Pain and Therapy, 13(2), 251–268.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., et al. (2006). Guidance on the con-duct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews (Version 1). ESRC Methods Programme.
Qiao, H. Y., Xin, L., & Wu, S. L. (2020). Analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for frozen shoulder: A randomized controlled trial protocol. Medicine, 99(31), e21399.
Ramirez, J. (2019). Adhesive capsulitis: Diagnosis and management. American Family Physician, 99(5), 297–300.
Schröder, S., Meyer-Hamme, G., Friedemann, T., Kirch, S., Hauck, M., Plaetke, R., et al. (2017). Immedi-ate pain relief in adhesive capsulitis by acupuncture: A randomized controlled double-blinded study. Pain Medicine, 18(11), 2235–2247.
Simplicio, C. L., Purita, J., Murrell, W., Santos, G. S., Dos Santos, R. G., & Lana, J. F. S. D. (2020). Extracor-poreal shock wave therapy mechanisms in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 11(Suppl 3), S309–S318.
Speed, C. (2014). A systematic review of shockwave therapies in soft tissue conditions. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(21), 1538–1542.
Suwalak, P., Champaiboon, J., Tantisiriwat, N., & Boonhong, J. (2021). Focused extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in non-calcific adhesive capsulitis: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. ASEAN Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 31.
Vahdatpour, B., Taheri, P., Zade, A. Z., & Moradian, S. (2014). Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in frozen shoulder. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 5(7), 875–881.
Vahdatpour, B., Taheri, P., Zade, A. Z., & Moradian, S. (2014). Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in frozen shoulder. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 5(7), 875–881.
Wang, C. J. (2012). Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Ortho-paedic Surgery and Research, 7, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-11
Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis (Vol. 59). Sage Publica-tions.
Zhang, R., Wang, Z., Liu, R., Zhang, N., Guo, J., & Huang, Y. (2022). Extracorporeal shockwave therapy as an adjunctive therapy for frozen shoulder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 10(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mona Idris, Hussein Aldera, Thamer Al-Shammary, Shorouk Aljarallah, Saeid Al Matif, Amirah Alotaibi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.