Mobile tracking ecosystem on motor engagement and physical performance: a cluster-randomized trial

Authors

  • Youness Moudettir Multidisciplinary Laboratory in Education Sciences and Training Engineering (LMSEIF). Sport Science Assessment and Physical Activity Didactic. Normal Higher School (ENS-C), Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6793-740X
  • Siham Ouhrir Multidisciplinary Laboratory in Education Sciences and Training Engineering (LMSEIF). Sport Science Assessment and Physical Activity Didactic. Normal Higher School (ENS-C), Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9870-5655
  • Said Lotfi Multidisciplinary Laboratory in Education Sciences and Training Engineering (LMSEIF). Sport Science Assessment and Physical Activity Didactic. Normal Higher School (ENS-C), Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0008-6145

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v81.119074

Keywords:

Adolescent physical activity, cluster-randomized controlled trial, mobile tracking, motor engagement, physical education

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescent physical inactivity remains a significant public health challenge. In North African urban contexts, limited extracurricular infrastructure and sedentary behaviors contribute to physical deconditioning among secondary students.

Objective: This study examined the effects of a multi-component mobile tracking ecosystem on motor engagement and physical performance among Moroccan secondary students from contrasting socioeconomic backgrounds.

Methodology: A cluster-randomized controlled trial enrolled 295 urban adolescents (59% female; M age = 16.99 ± 0.82 years) across nine intact classes (experimental: n = 161; control: n = 134) for 12 weeks. The intervention combined personalized training protocols, free tracking applications (Strava, Google Fit), WhatsApp peer-support networks, and 12 autonomous community sessions. Motor engagement was assessed via systematic ALT-PE observation (κ ≥ .78); physical performance via Luc Léger shuttle run, Ruffier-Dickson index, and Killy wall-sit test.

Results: Motor Appropriate engagement increased by +21.9 percentage points in the experimental group (48.7% - 70.5%; d_z = 6.54, p < .001), while declining in controls. Physical fitness improved significantly: Luc Léger +1.54 paliers (+25.7%), Killy +26.3 s (+21.7%), Ruffier-Dickson −1.05 points (−27.4%; all p < .001). No significant engagement-fitness correlations were found (r = −.08 to .10, all p > .26).

Discussion: Intervention effects exceeded typical benchmarks for technology-enhanced physical education. Absence of socioeconomic moderation confirmed the equity potential of peer-pairing pedagogy in resource-constrained contexts.

Conclusions: A low-cost mobile tracking ecosystem substantially improves motor engagement and physical fitness in secondary school physical education, with effects equitably distributed across socioeconomic strata.

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Ben Rakaa, O., Bassiri, M., & Lotfi, S. (2024a). Defining the effect of teachers' medical history on their inclusive teaching practice: Analyzing feelings of competence and knowledge in inclusive phys-ical education. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 24(5), 777–783. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2024.5.13

Ben Rakaa, O., Bassiri, M., & Lotfi, S. (2024b). Epidemiological study of the physical ability to practice physical education in children with school pathologies. Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiolo-gy, 10(4), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v10i4.18522

Ben Rakaa, O., Bassiri, M., & Lotfi, S. (2025). Adapted pedagogical strategies in inclusive physical educa-tion for students with special educational needs: A systematic review. Pedagogy of Physical Cul-ture and Sports, 29(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2025.0201

Breed, R., Kay, A., Spittle, M., & Orth, D. (2024). The effect of pedagogical approach on physical activity of girls during physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 95(4), 824–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2329165

Buchheit, M., & Laursen, P. B. (2013). High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Sports Medicine, 43(5), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x

Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., Carty, C., Chaput, J.-P., Chas-tin, S., Chou, R., Dempsey, P. C., DiPietro, L., Ekelund, U., Firth, J., Friedenreich, C. M., Garcia, L., Gichu, M., Jago, R., Katzmarzyk, P. T., … Willumsen, J. F. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(24), 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955

Burns, R. D., Fu, Y., & Podlog, L. W. (2017). School-based physical activity interventions and physical activity enjoyment: A meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 103, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.011

Calderón, A., Meroño, L., & MacPhail, A. (2020). A student-centred digital technology approach: The relationship between intrinsic motivation, learning climate and academic achievement of phys-ical education pre-service teachers. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19850852

Collins, L. M., Dziak, J. J., Kugler, K. C., & Trail, J. B. (2014). Factorial experiments: Efficient tools for evaluation of intervention components. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 47(4), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.06.021

Dahlgren, A., Sjöblom, L., Eke, H., Bonn, S. E., & Trolle Lagerros, Y. (2021). Screen time and physical ac-tivity in children and adolescents aged 10–15 years. PLOS ONE, 16(7), Article e0254255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254255

Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Fu, Y., Burns, R. D., Gomes, E., Savignac, A., & Constantino, N. (2017). Trends in sedentary behavior, physical activity, and motivation during a classroom-based active video game program. Inter-national Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(10), Article 1268. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101268

Gea-García, G. M., & Martínez López, E. L. (2025). Motivational climate, satisfaction, and intrinsic moti-vation in university students after the application of a gamified intervention using traditional sports games. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 108(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2025-0008

Gil-Espinosa, F. J., Nielsen-Rodríguez, A., Romance, R., & Burgueño, R. (2022). Smartphone applications for physical activity promotion from physical education. Education and Information Technolo-gies, 27(8), 11759–11779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11108-2

Gil-Espinosa, F. J., Romance García, R., & Nielsen Rodríguez, A. (2020). Smartphone use and academic performance: A randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0228430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228430

Gomes, L., Teixeira, D., Slawinska, M., Davis, P., López-Flores, M., Nyström, M., Silva, M., Palmeira, A., & Pereira, H. (2024). Adolescents' perspectives on smartphone applications for physical activity promotion. Retos, 56, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v56.104357

Guijarro-Romero, S., Mayorga-Vega, D., Casado-Robles, C., & Viciana, J. (2023). Effect of an activity wristband-based intermittent teaching unit in physical education on students' physical activity and its psychological mediators: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. School-fit study. Fron-tiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1228925. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1228925

Hrušová, D., Chaloupský, D., Chaloupská, P., & Hruša, P. (2024). Blended learning in physical education: Application and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1380041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1380041

Ibragimova, E., Uraimov, S., Baitassov, Y., Yuldasheva, S., Kutlimuratova, D., & Litwinowa, M. (2025). Digital motivation: Fitness apps and student physical activity. Retos, 67, 1162–1173. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v67.113635

Léger, L. A., Mercier, D., Gadoury, C., & Lambert, J. (1988). The multistage 20-metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. Journal of Sports Sciences, 6(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640418808729800

Leone, M., Bui, H. T., Kalinova, E., Lemoyne, J., Gagnon, D., Léger, L., Larivière, G., & Allisse, M. (2024). Investigation of underlying association between anthropometric and cardiorespiratory fitness markers among overweight and obese adolescents in Canada. International Journal of Envi-ronmental Research and Public Health, 21(4), Article 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040408

Martín-Rodríguez, A., & Madrigal-Cerezo, R. (2025). Technology-enhanced pedagogy in physical educa-tion: Bridging engagement, learning, and lifelong activity. Education Sciences, 15(4), Article 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040409

Mateo-Orcajada, A., Abenza-Cano, L., & Vaquero-Cristóbal, R. (2023a). Differences according to sex and academic year in the use of step tracker applications in secondary school students. Healthcare, 11(9), Article 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091286

Mateo-Orcajada, A., Abenza-Cano, L., Martínez-Pardo, J. M., González-Gálvez, N., & Vaquero-Cristóbal, R. (2023b). Influence of a mandatory step tracker intervention on body composition and physical fitness of adolescent students: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), Article 3620. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043620

Mateo-Orcajada, A., Abenza-Cano, L., & Vaquero-Cristóbal, R. (2024a). Importance of perceived quality and usability of step tracker mobile apps for their use by adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 29(1), Article 2389310. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2389310

Mateo-Orcajada, A., Abenza-Cano, L., & Vaquero-Cristóbal, R. (2024b). Effect of a mandatory step tracker use intervention on body composition in adolescent students: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(6), 1755–1769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14060116

McCambridge, J., Witton, J., & Elbourne, D. R. (2014). Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015

Moudettir, Y., Ouhrir, S., & Lotfi, S. (2025a). Enhancing cognitive ergonomics and pedagogical quality: A comprehensive evaluation framework for technological pedagogical tools in physical educa-tion. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 54(3), 5007–5029. https://doi.org/10.48047/53m9x307

Moudettir, Y., Ouhrir, S., & Lotfi, S. (2025b). Enhancing endurance running performance and student engagement through mobile tracking applications. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 54(3), 5030–5045. https://doi.org/10.48047/1rg82891

Moudettir, Y., Ouhrir, S., & Lotfi, S. (2025c). Impact of mobile tracking applications on adolescents’ physical fitness and motivational outcomes in Physical Education. Retos, 73, 923–936. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v73.117648

Munn, E. E., Hill, L. F., Lang, D. M., Brock, S. J., Hastie, P., & Pangelinan, M. M. (2024). Academic learning time in physical education (ALT-PE) during an adapted tennis program for children with au-tism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 70(4), 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2022.2143619

Omarov, B., Batyrbekov, A., Dalbekova, K., Abdulkarimova, G., Berkimbaeva, S., & Kenzhegulova, S. (2024). Assessing the efficacy of an artificial intelligence-driven real-time exercise monitoring system in computer-supported collaborative learning. Retos, 60. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.109170

Oshanova, N., Bolshevikovna, G., Tekesbayeva, N., Turashova, S., Anuarbekova, G., & Bukanova, A. (2025). Evaluación de la eficacia de un sistema de monitoreo de ejercicios en tiempo real im-pulsado por inteligencia artificial en el aprendizaje colaborativo asistido por computadora. Re-tos, 67, 580–596. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v67.114434

Quílez-Cuartero, A., Morcillo-Martínez, A., & Fernández Bustos, J. G. (2026). Optimizando el tiempo de compromiso motor en Educación Física: efectos sobre la actividad física y motivación del alumnado. Retos, 80, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v80.118928

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Schmidt, S. C. E., Anedda, B., Burchartz, A., Eichsteller, A., Kolb, S., Nigg, C., Niessner, C., Oriwol, D., Worth, A., & Woll, A. (2020). Physical activity and screen time of children and adolescents be-fore and during the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany: A natural experiment. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 21780. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78438-4

Siedentop, D. (1982). Academic learning time,Physical education: Coding manual. Ohio State Universi-ty.

Sotos-Martinez, V. J., Ferriz-Valero, A., García-Martínez, S., & Tortosa-Martinez, J. (2024). The effects of gamification on the motivation and basic psychological needs of secondary school physical ed-ucation students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 29(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2022.2039611

Sultan, D., Omarov, B., Rakhymzhanov, A., Niyazov, A., Baikuvekov, M., & Omarov, B. (2024). Develop-ment of an artificial intelligence-enabled non-invasive digital stethoscope for monitoring the heart condition of athletes in real-time. Retos, 60, 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.108633

UNESCO. (2021). When schools shut: Gendered impacts of COVID-19 school closures. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379270

Wang, J.-W., Zhu, Z., Shuling, Z., Fan, J., Jin, Y., Gao, Z.-L., Chen, W.-D., & Li, X. (2024). Effectiveness of mHealth app-based interventions for increasing physical activity and improving physical fit-ness in children and adolescents: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 12, Article e51478. https://doi.org/10.2196/51478

Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128

Xu, Y., Peng, J., Jing, F., & Ren, H. (2024). From wearables to performance: How acceptance of IoT de-vices influences physical education results in college students. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article 24150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75071-3

Zhao, J., Sitthiworachart, J., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2025). The impact of AI-integrated sport blended learn-ing on primary school students' sports skills and attitudes. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 18, Article e18755399397619250721071324. https://doi.org/10.2174/011875399X397619250721071324

Downloads

Published

07-05-2026

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

Moudettir, Y., Ouhrir, S., & Lotfi, S. (2026). Mobile tracking ecosystem on motor engagement and physical performance: a cluster-randomized trial. Retos, 81, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v81.119074