Design and validation of the game performance evaluation tool in invasion games: Goubak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v63.108261Keywords:
sports initiation, decision making, skill execution, support, mark, regulated opposition, observation, physical educationAbstract
Introduction and objective: novel sports facilitate the homogeneity of the level of expertise in the students, favoring a more equal environment in the practice of sports in the school context. In this sense, the aim of this article was to design, validate and adapt the Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI) for Goubak learning. A new sport with a regulation that favors playing in mixed teams, greater inclusion and participation, innovative structural elements and that is present in numerous regional curricular decrees in Spain. A new instrument for the evaluation of game performance (decision making, technical execution, support and marking) has been developed and validated to facilitate its use in Physical Education classes and in extracurricular contexts.
Methods: expert judges' ratings were considered, Pearson's correlation was used to determine the ability of researchers to reproduce results. Intra-observer reliability values exceeded the value of 0.7 in all cases except receptive decision making, which had a value of 0.537. For the inter-observer reliability values, a total of 37,740 actions of 20 players were analyzed by two trained observers, determining an adequate reliability.
Results and conclusions: the instrument is composed of a total of eight defined and validated criteria, linked to four components: decision making, technical execution, support and marking. One of the positive aspects of the instrument is the reduced number of criteria used, thus facilitating actual implementation by teachers in the school context and extracurricular sport.
References
Aguilar, J., Martín, I., & Chirosa, L. J. (2016). The assessment in physical education through the "Game Perfomance Assessment Instrument" (GPAI). Estudios Pedagógicos, 42(2), 7-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052016000200001
Almond, L. (1986). Research-based teaching in games. En J. Evans (Ed.), Physical Education, Sport and Schooling: Studies in the Sociology of Physical Education (pp. 155–165). Falmer Press.
Aranda, R., González-Ródenas, J., López-Bondia, I., Aranda-Malavés, R., Tudela-Desantes, A., & Anguera, M. T. (2019). "REOFUT" as an observation tool for tactical analysis on offensive performance in soccer: Mixed method perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01476
Arias, J. L., & Castejón, F. J. (2012). Review of the instruments most frequently employed to assess tac-tics in physical education and youth sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.31.4.381
Arias-Estero, J. L., & Castejón, F. (2014). Using instruments for tactical assessment in physical education and extra-curricular sports. European Physical Education Review 20(4), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X14539214
Barquero-Ruiz, C., Arias-Estero, J. L., & Kirk, D. (2020). Assessment for tactical learning in games: a sys-tematic review. European Physical Education Review, 26(4), 827-847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19889649
Barquero-Ruiz, C., Kirk, D., & Arias-Estero, J. L. (2022). Design and validation of the tactical assessment instrument in football (TAIS). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 93(3), 615-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1889457
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 32, 347–364.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Caldevilla Calderón, P., & Zapatero Ayuso, J. A. (2022). Los deportes alternativos como contenidos para la educación física en educación secundaria (Alternative sports as content for physical educa-tion in secondary education). Retos, 46, 1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.94422
Cohen J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conejero Suárez, M., Claver Rabaz, F., Fernández-Echeverría, C., González-Silva, J., & Moreno Arroyo, M. P. (2017). Diseño y validación de un instrumento de observación para valorar la toma de deci-siones en la acción de recepción en voleibol. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 12(34), 67-75. www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=163049997008
García-López, L. M., & Gutiérrez-Díaz, D. (2016). Aprendiendo a enseñar deportes. Modelos de enseñan-za comprensiva y educación deportiva. Inde.
García-López, L. M., González-Víllora, S., Gutiérrez-Díaz D., & Serra-Olivares, J. (2013). Development and validation of the game performance evaluation tool (GPET) in soccer. Sport TK, 2, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.6018/185791
Goubaksport. (s.f.). Goubaksport. https://goubaksport.com/
Guijarro, E., MacPhail, A., Arias-Palencia, N. M., & González-Víllora, S. (2022). Exploring game perfor-mance and game involvement: Effects of a sport education season and a combined sport educa-tion-teaching games for understanding unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 41(3), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0170
Hernández Hernández, E., & Palao Andrés, J. M. (2013). Design and validation of an instrument to assess the conceptual contents of volleyball in secondary education. Apunts. Educación Física y De-portes, 111, 38-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2013/1).111.04
Kinnerk, P., Harvey, S., MacDonncha, C., & Lyons, M. (2018). A review of the game-based approaches to coaching literature in competitive team sport settings. Quest, 70(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2018.1439390
Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.21.2.177
López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative as-sessment in physical education: a review of international literature. Sport, Education and Socie-ty, 18(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
Manso-Lorenzo, V., Evangelio, C., Fraile-García, J., Ibaibarriaga-Toset, Á., & González-Víllora, S. (2022). Goubak® in physical education: Strategies for understanding a new sport for everyone. Strate-gies, 35(3), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052775
Manso-Lorenzo, V., Evangelio, C., Ruiz-Tendero, G., & González-Víllora, S. (2020). Teacher or student-centred model? Step-by-step analysis of basic psychological needs of a new sport-goubak. Jour-nal of Physical Education and Sport 20(6), 3212–3221. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s6436
Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2008). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Some con-cerns and solutions for further development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(2), 220-240. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.27.2.220
Méndez-Giménez, A. (2009) (coord.). Modelos actuales de iniciación deportiva. Unidades didácticas sobre deportes de invasión. Wanceulen.
Mitchell, S.A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L. L. (2006). Teaching sport concepts and skills: a tactical games approach (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.
O’Connor, J., Alfrey, L., & Penney, D. (2021). Rethinking the classification of games and sports in physi-cal education: a response to changes in sport and participation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 29(3), 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2022.2061938
O’Donoghue, P. (2007). Reliability issues in performance analysis. International Journal of Perfor-mance Analysis in Sport, 7(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2007.11868386
Oslin, J. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Griffin, L. L. (1998). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.17.2.231
Otero, F. M., Carmona, J., Albornoz, M., Calvo, A., & Díaz, J. A. (2014). Metodología de enseñanza de los deportes de invasión en primaria. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, 14(53), 69-87. cdepor-te.rediris.es/revista/revista53/artintervencion439.htm
Real Decreto 157/2022, de 1 de marzo, por el que se establecen la ordenación y las enseñanzas míni-mas de la Educación Primaria. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 52, de 3 de marzo de 2022. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2022/03/01/157/con
Rovegno, I., Nevett, M., Brock, S., & Babiarz, M. (2001). Chapter 7: Teaching and learning basic invasion-game tactics in 4th grade: A descriptive study from situated and constraints theoretical per-spectives. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20(4), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.20.4.370
Santos, S., Sarmento, H., Alves, J., & Campaniço, J. (2014). Construcción de un instrumento para la ob-servación y el análisis de las interacciones en el waterpolo. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 23(1), 191-200. psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-06721-022
Teoldo, I., Garganta, J., Greco, P. J., Mesquita, I., & Maia, J. (2011). System of tactical assessment in soccer (FUT-SAT): Development and preliminary validation. Motricidade, 7(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.121
Vors, O., & Kirk, D. (2016). Classroom life and the importance of context in physical education: from ecological approaches to situationist theories. Recherches & Educations, 15, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.4000/rechercheseducations.3033
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Víctor Manso-Lorenzo, Eva Guijarro Jareño, Sixto González-Víllora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
